From: "Benoît Thébaudeau" <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx51evk: Add CONFIG_REVISION_TAG
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 15:41:24 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2023277454.4655204.1347975684715.JavaMail.root@advansee.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CEF1C43EC1BF464090308EB428E1360001BA57@AMEXMB02.ds.jdsu.net>
Hi Greg, Fabio,
On Tuesday, September 18, 2012 3:00:58 PM, Greg Topmiller wrote:
> Fabio/Benoit,
>
> I tried the get_board_rev alone and it worked on my mx51evk.
>
> In the FSL u-boot version I am using the set_board_rev is:
> static inline void set_board_rev(int rev)
> {
> system_rev |= (rev & 0xF) << 8;
> }
>
> It is not called for the mx51evk but is used for mx35_3stack.
>
> The set_board_rev code below doesn't make sense when looking at the
> FSL u-boot code or the main line and comparing to the mx51evk
> schematic. I don't see where either the FSL u-boot or the main line
> u-boot set up iomux for GPIO0_22. There are four pin possibilities,
> EIM_EB2, NANDF_CS6, CSPI1_MOSI, and UART3_RXD. On the schematic the
> UART3_RXD is tied low so that would be the only pin to make sense in
> this case. To make the "set_board_rev" code below work the mx51evk
> board specific code would have to set up the UART3_RXD to be
> GPIO0_22 by making its function ALT3. That being said the code
> below would not be a problem since the if logic would most likely be
> positive in any case and the system_rev would be or'd with board rev
> 2.
>
> Let me know if you want the schematic I'm looking at. It's a PDF.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Greg
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fabio Estevam [mailto:festevam at gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 11:25 PM
> To: Beno?t Th?baudeau
> Cc: U-Boot-Users ML; Greg Topmiller; Stefano Babic
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mx51evk: Add CONFIG_REVISION_TAG
>
> Hi Beno?t ,
>
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Beno?t Th?baudeau
> <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com> wrote:
>
> > +u32 get_board_rev(void)
> > +{
> > + return get_cpu_rev();
> > +}
>
> Is this enough? Looking at FSL U-boot there is also a:
>
> static inline void set_board_rev(void)
> {
> if ((__REG(GPIO1_BASE_ADDR + 0x0) & (0x1 << 22)) == 0)
> system_rev |= BOARD_REV_2_0 << BOARD_VER_OFFSET;
>
> }
>
> On mx53loco I had very weird problems when kernel was running and it
> took me sometime to find out that it was due to wrong detection of
> the board revision, so I suggest to double check this to avoid this
> kind of problem on mx51evk too.
>
> Regards,
>
> Fabio Estevam
It looks like there is confusion between the 3stack and Babbage boards here:
Fabio, the code you refer to in FSL U-Boot comes from the Babbage board, while
AFAIK, the mx51evk mainline U-Boot board corresponds to the 3stack board (this
is also FSL's naming for this board on their website).
Best regards,
Beno?t
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-18 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CEF1C43EC1BF464090308EB428E1360001B95B@AMEXMB02.ds.jdsu.net>
2012-09-17 19:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx51evk: Add CONFIG_REVISION_TAG Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-09-18 3:24 ` Fabio Estevam
[not found] ` <CEF1C43EC1BF464090308EB428E1360001BA57@AMEXMB02.ds.jdsu.net>
2012-09-18 13:36 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-09-18 13:41 ` Benoît Thébaudeau [this message]
2012-09-18 13:38 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-09-18 13:54 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-09-18 14:02 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-09-18 14:11 ` Fabio Estevam
[not found] ` <CEF1C43EC1BF464090308EB428E1360001BAA1@AMEXMB02.ds.jdsu.net>
2012-09-18 14:19 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-09-18 14:36 ` Stefano Babic
2012-09-18 14:32 ` Stefano Babic
2012-09-18 16:01 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-09-18 16:12 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-09-18 14:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] " Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-09-18 15:11 ` Fabio Estevam
2012-09-23 17:55 ` Stefano Babic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2023277454.4655204.1347975684715.JavaMail.root@advansee.com \
--to=benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox