From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [85.214.62.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 492E2C3DA4B for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 14:10:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h2850616.stratoserver.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC34B884E2; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 16:10:30 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="g1sUsLhG"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by phobos.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 109) id 670EE88A34; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 16:10:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com (fllv0015.ext.ti.com [198.47.19.141]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AD9C8800C for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 16:10:27 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nm@ti.com Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 46HEAJmK011833; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 09:10:19 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1721225419; bh=FzyvriWcOh2Js37fT14+XA2l8OJeruoT6NhpGtgyhu0=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=g1sUsLhGl01iRTlicE0AJX6SawfOkswpztjbcqQNvy4Ge05zNU1GR9cRppMmUM3wq 6NO0Aq0ACn34CPCrQ522iueofg6bJif+e97ZCsdhSPjwRxt4JlC+TtnWjYazJM18pu EJoFIStVRaBbDiw8GW0GaA3GhbeY3L2YsQq8XN+Y= Received: from DFLE115.ent.ti.com (dfle115.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.36]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 46HEAJL1046074 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 17 Jul 2024 09:10:19 -0500 Received: from DFLE108.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.29) by DFLE115.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 09:10:19 -0500 Received: from lelvsmtp5.itg.ti.com (10.180.75.250) by DFLE108.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 09:10:19 -0500 Received: from localhost (uda0133052.dhcp.ti.com [128.247.81.232]) by lelvsmtp5.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 46HEAJFf065162; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 09:10:19 -0500 Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 09:10:19 -0500 From: Nishanth Menon To: Francesco Dolcini CC: "Kumar, Udit" , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] configs: j784s4_evm : Increase Dynamic memory allocation size Message-ID: <20240717141019.xy2rjdnlukh542d6@eternity> References: <20240715174301.2688466-1-u-kumar1@ti.com> <20240716200555.GC85916@francesco-nb> <20240717073342.GA3312@francesco-nb> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240717073342.GA3312@francesco-nb> X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.8 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean On 09:33-20240717, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 09:40:11AM +0530, Kumar, Udit wrote: > > On 7/17/2024 1:35 AM, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 11:13:01PM +0530, Udit Kumar wrote: > > > > Increase malloc size to 32 MB to align with other J7 > > > > family devices. > > > Is this needed for any specific reason? I am asking to understand if > > > other boards using the same SOC should be updated to prevent > > > $random_issue. > > Since DFU is not supported yet in mainline u-boot, so I avoided to mention > > that failure. > > > > Also this change is generic, so i thought of pushing it now instead of > > waiting for DFU series. > > Thanks for the update, on our board DFU works fine on our j784s4 based > board (UUU or UMS are not working, but this is off topic for this > conversation ;-) I still think your comment is valid - commit message does need to explain something like "make space for future standard features such as DFU etc.." -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D