From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [85.214.62.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14C14D597C8 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 02:40:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h2850616.stratoserver.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49DE088E3F; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 03:40:37 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=konsulko.com Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=konsulko.com header.i=@konsulko.com header.b="VYUcbxaT"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by phobos.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 109) id 82792894C9; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 03:40:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-qt1-x82f.google.com (mail-qt1-x82f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 591B288CF1 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 03:40:34 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=konsulko.com Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=trini@konsulko.com Received: by mail-qt1-x82f.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-460d1145cd8so48165601cf.3 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2024 18:40:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=konsulko.com; s=google; t=1731465633; x=1732070433; darn=lists.denx.de; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TW8KFaAjA/sx3sGXA7scqqO68RTTP3QlHMRWTbU4pC0=; b=VYUcbxaTrDgfe2zlNz7+yrByxlST7CwCO2C170cC6KirwVX+kQqQDyURB6qezFcIkW NFUmYWm/qme0CmUAGFHhg5VPrz7yYFmaFziw6TGwnDgJ01K4GqURe2lzAjiutwLrY0t9 ndsCaAbaY58WfYJSd8vF1BRJuMjKBcGDLeX00= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1731465633; x=1732070433; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=TW8KFaAjA/sx3sGXA7scqqO68RTTP3QlHMRWTbU4pC0=; b=k0WcTt53+g7YKyjVjQ/f1zgSd7g0/CP3frUGQMUSwbJyTvEkollDgc0ZL1w9Ev6rX4 heUgkw+JUYa6TB1OJ5CqW8cxxy4cTwiFFGONwU6OahZlOnEpiewWULCxpa3msUgW4/yf DfIS4nu44b+KFEknTfMvlJaoFgJcrtQWX4Kn/6Rq2PUP8zhGNFxTAK3kc/keYa3CqpO5 XIzyeuNOKJtHHb9k87D8/QpfHdpMnCWLdJUhcrwOyzVZ7pPidNpCM9g6JOt/p660g6fL E6eBc5jGHbeFDiovctziKh3tMHMQWNTKj4uaxWYYI7fIkbe1bGjniBHL8M8gRfFlBPcy 2rkw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzcxFIvsmzqtR+qSZEgOn1g4kpO6OwWdk6HOYI8cAJKBGRaizZH UH4fp/qf3k/kG/Vt307hjxGmir/1Lz9pgS9tOMSwhplqoxbdnkh1fkF7qTO4Lbw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGoWb4UoQRP7FaDNmDQnIDX1kXRd597zoPQpPtSjeeUOylcIEkBdVCpFzideUORgjKd2l8RFg== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:590f:0:b0:460:93b6:a4d1 with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-46309388200mr300893341cf.31.1731465633220; Tue, 12 Nov 2024 18:40:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from bill-the-cat ([187.144.30.219]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d75a77b69052e-462ff47c162sm82829081cf.53.2024.11.12.18.40.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 12 Nov 2024 18:40:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 20:40:29 -0600 From: Tom Rini To: Simon Glass Cc: U-Boot Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] buildman: Propose a format for extra boards Message-ID: <20241113024029.GH3600562@bill-the-cat> References: <20241108152350.3686274-1-sjg@chromium.org> <20241108152350.3686274-9-sjg@chromium.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SckQUPlNYCKr2fF1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241108152350.3686274-9-sjg@chromium.org> X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.8 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean --SckQUPlNYCKr2fF1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 08:23:49AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > It has become more common to use config fragments to extend or adjust > the functionality of boards in U-Boot. >=20 > Propose a format for how to deal with this. It is not implemented as > yet. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass I think that the first problem is that this patch series is an inappropriate method and place to start the discussion. I also think this gets things backwards as the common case is "make", not "buildman". We need more defconfig's that are just base + fragment(s) if they're important enough to be a combination that needs to be tested and work. A board is not a time-expensive part of CI. A pytest run is, a new job itself is. --=20 Tom --SckQUPlNYCKr2fF1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGzBAABCgAdFiEEGjx/cOCPqxcHgJu/FHw5/5Y0tywFAmc0EZEACgkQFHw5/5Y0 tyzAlQv/dxm917U0jl1dmUgQbWgJblLW4+DflHwvAlVkiFdjPCokiEaEUo5vSjsW p2ARPhfDsWvld137mgQgnwLyhTCb0kcbdLgCkKNtfvgWUGnoTGGeFBx8iMC7tksP MTSeTCScL2OcZlm+WOfgFHIXvHG7eL9xeTO2iAhUMkWlmNn26M13ZyTBHtXPGI8m vBg1khCzRrc5fQEFdqQ5IBUTlU4GkIpSm2TTpvHOxA2a7kmyJk0LyRXkx+dI2CG2 tjfLJpGvDG+5Ixw8NjXAQVfWmH8l1hc1Hz5Zh04dU6rYfHg/IvQeFy5hpqTR1c3d 1Laba7vCKzjbGKWwo+Jz7TfP4rxuWCwzZ5KAxMt5eIz0QrONGzwOgLmIU/TKpR7Q 9SCVZfcEgVlHfxu7ZK8wHz92HMcQVMFzSO7YZPsfZ5qbTF76qrVh2KxMtI9zK+qp 8VspJZao6QA0bS3pk+6uOPijVJUvsetmCYhpzsWGdo4rH5TcxlnUKHt+VXoWGKrY 1ytqDJaO =GEHD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SckQUPlNYCKr2fF1--