From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [85.214.62.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 629C9C282EC for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 15:53:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h2850616.stratoserver.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7871810F4; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 16:53:07 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=konsulko.com Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=konsulko.com header.i=@konsulko.com header.b="ppHcRBXG"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by phobos.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 109) id C127581026; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 16:53:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pl1-x632.google.com (mail-pl1-x632.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::632]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C14E8198F for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 16:53:02 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=konsulko.com Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=trini@konsulko.com Received: by mail-pl1-x632.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-22438c356c8so102191305ad.1 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 08:53:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=konsulko.com; s=google; t=1742313181; x=1742917981; darn=lists.denx.de; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=B7oa5gNq/jZLPU6af3sO/gJvV8YzdOgeMfBBH+mAfRE=; b=ppHcRBXGzyYf8EGe504llAG+fnOmVwjsiiL5QOIwvHqsSdRMdL043K1KLg9KAsYaU+ zaRDDPIy/qCLcTVJpu21fAmVw4EdM65VuVlqAuKOB1St1LmElGhvPiJDIjo9IO0RTTQW /CxlKBYhuxA7vSvSbAu9jb9ls3PH44K/xpiIE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1742313181; x=1742917981; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=B7oa5gNq/jZLPU6af3sO/gJvV8YzdOgeMfBBH+mAfRE=; b=U/yi5YQWlJttUrQYEKWeI4UElOmUuDiUlA1kTryt1/2ijY64Bh7vDZuTTB29W3bs0x ml4N2kE3ngaQ4vlXuqZPpWEku3aRYxRmd+a+cSeC7tBfr23dAMYg7QPGoTaeKcCtMd+a 02FPjZCnFg72eJ0dVqgW6tFF+0eBAu+RyhqSwMXlWOYF7lhL4RoyD8T3CMPBrvbuh8JD p4+bC7NLPsrUmOzMyf4vnF8Ct0R4U9FuxNT61VhpxwlFBIkzJrAUxd4jSxvc5y33h6ga b40x8ME9WVG2dNUjprvpZTYwSxPYim6otBX1++lyVDUvStXtMWyk8Kd6Qd3V2LEeXq7P ya/w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxX6S9ziR3A2CqyMNuLV/CtcqLDJQybGVSEvHITffFkaAklXsC7 QftYb5alcqS2KyizO/6rKNc/Ge3/Ete+ySQ8Yn3Sjc/3gE5BHBKvoQMyEzK6cC4= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctq7fMwXotwhhtfPk7jpiqbaggZ67ARgd0GxCdoEWuJVV2yXQoi+oSs5mF7ECw 2qggoUxtfcIGMhQJgjWb522yqCvZZF6U8N6BFlZ0MEFVNcdC/ufOZ7mE3mcCAiPnt4HkIfMnvNN XOD+jcyQkRsCy2H3u8oP4j4pTFuqi6DJABX4aSfRB7t4TGBKbxWaJytOVMucTsM2Wpj+K22RIRq 174vYqZIG+xZEHP6zsE6Zs9tsKGb1P95Yp/FqjTaLPKSzySsKoT1KFO/jHo5dz4ueZs7TS3I30T FPOhZ5KuaXktNnZQasYAgBK10cARFmWEsCbtb1UqshRBKw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGa/k6J4tfqfF3zbeuWKiHpyZSN+HnY8cJvMLF7yi25z1PA3yUU7h+TVHyJKP0kamK2tCB6zA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:22c8:b0:220:faa2:c917 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-225e0af8c73mr253458175ad.34.1742313180874; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 08:53:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bill-the-cat ([187.144.138.125]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-225c68aa62csm96621755ad.92.2025.03.18.08.52.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 18 Mar 2025 08:53:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 09:52:56 -0600 From: Tom Rini To: Simon Glass , Heinrich Schuchardt Cc: U-Boot Mailing List , Bin Meng , Guillaume La Roque , Heinrich Schuchardt , Igor Opaniuk , Ilias Apalodimas , Jerome Forissier , Julien Masson , Julius Lehmann , Marek Vasut , Martyn Welch , Mattijs Korpershoek , Quentin Schulz Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 38/46] boot: Consider non-bootable partitions Message-ID: <20250318155256.GA2640854@bill-the-cat> References: <20250315142643.2600605-1-sjg@chromium.org> <20250315142643.2600605-39-sjg@chromium.org> <20250318140400.GX2640854@bill-the-cat> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="svMT9tupSEWL2SI8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.8 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean --svMT9tupSEWL2SI8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 03:24:02PM +0000, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, >=20 > On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 at 15:04, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 02:25:58PM +0000, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > Any 'bootable' flag in a DOS partition causes boostd to only scan > > > bootable partitions for that media. This can mean that extlinux.conf > > > files on the root disk are missed. > > > > > > Put this logic behind a flag and update the documentation. > > > > > > For now, the flag is enabled, to preserve existing behaviour. Future > > > work may provide a command (or some other mechanism) to control this. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass > > > > Isn't this backwards as the existing behavior (prior to bootstd) was to > > scan and use these files, and so that's the behavior we need to preserve > > by default. >=20 > Not so far as I know, but I've already spent too much time trying to > decode those scripts. >=20 > If you look at scan_dev_for_boot_part, that is what I was trying to > replicate with bootstd. The feedback from the community call where this was brought up was that it used to work and now didn't, I thought. Heinrich, I think you had one of the cases here (something about RISC-V and multiple distros?) or am I misremembering? --=20 Tom --svMT9tupSEWL2SI8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGzBAABCgAdFiEEGjx/cOCPqxcHgJu/FHw5/5Y0tywFAmfZltUACgkQFHw5/5Y0 tyyxewv+LYJ+QgbKUqdjGzA3dMs6QXGmYEtliYlZq9iQexkN+X2auK0ptKQJBcmW bwWdQ/qDhphFCFJiS1wdnb1zvHaO1L75dcZmxbQAHX8h6/E0Nhn8rPu7NEkDCwt5 15HmDonkOHWjqo1GALEgzTjn1nO6WSDFRZSwIXltj1ykOoWhkxQdxYdGDOWBRBUY kzbQ200kMi7U5MFUCfHOOw+AxwasH16y2T2siFtyzpauNHhCL02P3yOFKttdBzv0 NUFW5ZZnDooBSbIdYpOYe+YMWS+FAIX6kobHON1ADP2I0KpMP05DhWMYnYQMD57H RhT+lOoAZtxzaLpFqbKyCN2YUty6Fmxwidk5RKjYLhy+gQzTJ4lNnV4W5rJ7EyYs Z9rQ/BRTFZOzkaGMkKCn1tBlBrvEVGHbXZag8ap9Y8QImO4ExcriyatdzfcUtXqN pcUttTPLHCtJ3I0HNDy2BzWq7K8W+uX5gRAEQa+XNiyBKDk5XxuEsIBZ89jlgnMU pJY49gz+ =TqGb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --svMT9tupSEWL2SI8--