U-Boot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Cc: jagan@amarulasolutions.com, trini@konsulko.com,
	macromorgan@hotmail.com, u-boot@lists.denx.de,
	linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sunxi: h616: dram: Rework size detection
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 01:18:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250324011854.0a05d29b@minigeek.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250309063143.62859-2-jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>

On Sun,  9 Mar 2025 07:31:42 +0100
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Jernej,

thanks for keeping digging into this long-standing problem!

> Since there is quite a few possible DRAM configurations in terms of bus
> width, rank and rows and columns count, size detection algorithm must be
> very careful not to test combination which would be bigger than H616 is
> actually capable of handling.
> 
> Ideally, we should always detect memory aliasing, even for 4 GB memory
> size, which is the maximum amount of memory that H616 is capable of
> handling. For this reason, we have to configure minimum amount of
> supported rows when testing for columns and vice versa. This way test
> code will never step out of 4 GB boundary.
> 
> While at it, check for 17 rows maximum. This aligns code with BSP DRAM
> driver. There is probably no such configuration which would make sense
> with 4 GB memory.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>

The change itself looks good to me, I have not done enough tests myself
to confirm its reliability, but I trust the reports from others who
were more affected by this.

Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>

Cheers,
Andre


> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-sunxi/dram_sun50i_h616.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/dram_sun50i_h616.c b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/dram_sun50i_h616.c
> index b3554cc64bf5..6f84e59e39cd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/dram_sun50i_h616.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/dram_sun50i_h616.c
> @@ -1363,7 +1363,7 @@ static void mctl_auto_detect_rank_width(const struct dram_para *para,
>  static void mctl_auto_detect_dram_size(const struct dram_para *para,
>  				       struct dram_config *config)
>  {
> -	unsigned int shift;
> +	unsigned int shift, cols, rows;
>  
>  	/* max. config for columns, but not rows */
>  	config->cols = 11;
> @@ -1373,23 +1373,27 @@ static void mctl_auto_detect_dram_size(const struct dram_para *para,
>  	shift = config->bus_full_width + 1;
>  
>  	/* detect column address bits */
> -	for (config->cols = 8; config->cols < 11; config->cols++) {
> -		if (mctl_mem_matches(1ULL << (config->cols + shift)))
> +	for (cols = 8; cols < 11; cols++) {
> +		if (mctl_mem_matches(1ULL << (cols + shift)))
>  			break;
>  	}
> -	debug("detected %u columns\n", config->cols);
> +	debug("detected %u columns\n", cols);
>  
>  	/* reconfigure to make sure that all active rows are accessible */
> -	config->rows = 18;
> +	config->cols = 8;
> +	config->rows = 17;
>  	mctl_core_init(para, config);
>  
>  	/* detect row address bits */
>  	shift = config->bus_full_width + 4 + config->cols;
> -	for (config->rows = 13; config->rows < 18; config->rows++) {
> -		if (mctl_mem_matches(1ULL << (config->rows + shift)))
> +	for (rows = 13; rows < 17; rows++) {
> +		if (mctl_mem_matches(1ULL << (rows + shift)))
>  			break;
>  	}
> -	debug("detected %u rows\n", config->rows);
> +	debug("detected %u rows\n", rows);
> +
> +	config->cols = cols;
> +	config->rows = rows;
>  }
>  
>  static unsigned long mctl_calc_size(const struct dram_config *config)


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-03-24  1:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-09  6:31 [PATCH 0/2] sunxi: h616: fix DRAM size detection Jernej Skrabec
2025-03-09  6:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] sunxi: h616: dram: Rework " Jernej Skrabec
2025-03-10  9:16   ` Icenowy Zheng
2025-03-24  1:18   ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2025-03-09  6:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] sunxi: H616: dram: Improve address wrapping detection Jernej Skrabec
2025-03-10  2:36   ` Ryan Walklin
2025-03-25  1:13   ` Andre Przywara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250324011854.0a05d29b@minigeek.lan \
    --to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=jagan@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=macromorgan@hotmail.com \
    --cc=trini@konsulko.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox