Re: [PATCH] CI: Update the CI lab

[Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2189 bytes --]

On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 06:51:31AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> On Thu, 1 May 2025 at 09:30, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 01, 2025 at 09:03:15AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > On Thu, 1 May 2025 at 08:03, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 07:25:24PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Update the boards in the lab to match the current situation:
> > > > >
> > > > > - bbb and pin64 are working again
> > > >
> > > > And were never disabled in mainline (since iirc I never saw them not
> > > > working).
> > >
> > > OK good.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > - samus and c4 are still broken, with no end in sight
> > > >
> > > > Good to comment out.
> > > >
> > > > > - new boards for colibrimx8, rockpro64, rock3a/5b, rpi5, zybo
> > > >
> > > > Except the imx8 board doesn't work in CI in mainline and had it's own
> > > > long discussion that petered out.
> > >
> > > It has been fine for me.
> > >
> > > https://sjg.u-boot.org/u-boot/u-boot/-/jobs/49094
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Please v2 where you drop the line about bbb/pine64, and don't add
> > > > colibrimx8 until you or someone else are ready to work on the underlying
> > > > issues this exposed. Thanks.
> > >
> > > Do you know what issues?
> >
> > Yes, can you please look at the thread from your initial patches?
> 
> I see[1], but I'm still not sure what you are referring to. Is this a
> board which is broken with your tree, or is there some issue just with
> the lab?

I guess you forgot the related buildman changes which is where I
explained that:
- If there's blob problems, someone needs to go and look harder at the
  imx8/9 binman support.
- Looks like most of the imx families aren't using CONFIG_BUILD_TARGET
  and that needs to be fixed.

> Also I was wondering why Nvidia board was not in the list and then
> found this patch which is marked 'changes requested', but I don't see
> any reason:
> 
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20241217210920.2050997-1-sjg@chromium.org/
> 
> I marked it 'new' again.

Doesn't apply.

-- 
Tom

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]