U-Boot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <ravi@prevas.dk>
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de,
	Daniel Schwierzeck <daniel.schwierzeck@gmail.com>,
	Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger@ni.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] list.h/treewide: get rid of no-op prefetch()
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 08:06:30 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250618140630.GC6521@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ecvhzhyx.fsf@prevas.dk>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 943 bytes --]

On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 08:23:02AM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On Thu, May 22 2025, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 02:12:42PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> >
> >> While looking through list.h, I saw that the regular list_* helpers
> >> (and one of the hlist_* ones) still contain the prefetch() that was
> >> removed in linux 14 years ago. It doesn't do anything, but makes the
> >> macros harder to read, so get rid of it, and the fallback, no-op
> >> definition that they relied on. That requires removing a few uses
> >> outside list.h as well.
> >> 
> >
> > Unfortunately this leads to build problems on lots of platforms:
> > https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/jobs/1141951
> 
> Hi Tom
> 
> Now that the 'remove volatile from gd' series is in -next, could you see
> how these cleanups would fare on top of that?

Yes, I'll give it another spin right now.

-- 
Tom

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-18 14:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-07 12:12 [PATCH 0/4] list.h/treewide: get rid of no-op prefetch() Rasmus Villemoes
2025-05-07 12:12 ` [PATCH 1/4] linux/list.h: drop use of prefetch() Rasmus Villemoes
2025-05-07 12:12 ` [PATCH 2/4] treewide: drop no-op prefetch() calls Rasmus Villemoes
2025-05-07 12:12 ` [PATCH 3/4] mips: drop unused prefetch code and logic Rasmus Villemoes
2025-05-07 12:12 ` [PATCH 4/4] linux/list.h: drop fallback definition of prefetch() Rasmus Villemoes
2025-05-07 15:51 ` [PATCH 0/4] list.h/treewide: get rid of no-op prefetch() Tom Rini
2025-05-22 16:56 ` Tom Rini
2025-05-25 20:07   ` Rasmus Villemoes
2025-05-25 23:02     ` Tom Rini
2025-05-26 21:10       ` Rasmus Villemoes
2025-05-26 22:01         ` Tom Rini
2025-05-27 10:01           ` Rasmus Villemoes
2025-06-18  6:23   ` Rasmus Villemoes
2025-06-18 14:06     ` Tom Rini [this message]
2025-06-18 17:53 ` Tom Rini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250618140630.GC6521@bill-the-cat \
    --to=trini@konsulko.com \
    --cc=daniel.schwierzeck@gmail.com \
    --cc=joe.hershberger@ni.com \
    --cc=ravi@prevas.dk \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox