public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
To: Anshul Dalal <anshuld@ti.com>
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de, vigneshr@ti.com, afd@ti.com,
	m-chawdhry@ti.com, n-francis@ti.com, b-liu@ti.com, nm@ti.com,
	bb@ti.com, kever.yang@rock-chips.com, hl@rock-chips.com,
	tim@feathertop.org, marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/8] spl: mmc: split spl_mmc_do_fs_boot into regular/os_boot
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 12:32:53 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250916183253.GC124814@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250916105857.163951-4-anshuld@ti.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 678 bytes --]

On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 04:28:51PM +0530, Anshul Dalal wrote:

> Currently the logic to handle falcon mode as well as the regular boot is
> inside spl_mmc_do_fs_boot, this prevents us from cleanly extending
> falcon mode functionality like toggleable fallback to U-Boot proper.
> 
> Therefore this patch splits the logic into spl_mmc_fs_load and
> spl_mmc_fs_load_os to handle the regular boot and falcon mode use case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anshul Dalal <anshuld@ti.com>
[snip]
> +		printf("%s, Failed to load falcon payload: %d\n", __func__,
> +		       ret);
> +		printf("Fallback to U-Boot\n");

These are new. Do we really need to be adding them?

-- 
Tom

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-16 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-16 10:58 [PATCH v1 0/8] Add support for secure falcon mode: disable fallback Anshul Dalal
2025-09-16 10:58 ` [PATCH v1 1/8] spl: Kconfig: add SPL_OS_BOOT_SECURE config symbol Anshul Dalal
2025-09-16 10:58 ` [PATCH v1 2/8] spl: Kconfig: allow K3 devices to use falcon mode Anshul Dalal
2025-09-16 10:58 ` [PATCH v1 3/8] spl: mmc: split spl_mmc_do_fs_boot into regular/os_boot Anshul Dalal
2025-09-16 18:32   ` Tom Rini [this message]
2025-09-17 13:31     ` Anshul Dalal
2025-09-16 10:58 ` [PATCH v1 4/8] spl: ubi: refactor spl_ubi_load_image for falcon mode Anshul Dalal
2025-09-16 18:34   ` Tom Rini
2025-09-17 13:33     ` Anshul Dalal
2025-09-16 10:58 ` [PATCH v1 5/8] spl: spi: refactor spl_spi_load_image " Anshul Dalal
2025-09-16 10:58 ` [PATCH v1 6/8] spl: nor: refactor spl_nor_load_image " Anshul Dalal
2025-09-16 10:58 ` [PATCH v1 7/8] spl: nand: refactor spl_nand_load_image " Anshul Dalal
2025-09-16 10:58 ` [PATCH v1 8/8] spl: falcon: disable fallback to U-Boot on failure Anshul Dalal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250916183253.GC124814@bill-the-cat \
    --to=trini@konsulko.com \
    --cc=afd@ti.com \
    --cc=anshuld@ti.com \
    --cc=b-liu@ti.com \
    --cc=bb@ti.com \
    --cc=hl@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=kever.yang@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=m-chawdhry@ti.com \
    --cc=marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org \
    --cc=n-francis@ti.com \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=tim@feathertop.org \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox