From: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
To: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de, Adriano Cordova <adrianox@gmail.com>,
Andrew Goodbody <andrew.goodbody@linaro.org>,
Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>,
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>,
Sam Edwards <cfsworks@gmail.com>, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Synchronize DTC to 1.7.2
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 11:57:00 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251113175700.GM6688@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251113122145.949112-1-marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3215 bytes --]
On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 01:21:07PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Synchronize local copy of DTC with Linux 6.17 , using commits picked
> from Linux kernel. This also includes two fix up patches to make the
> DM core work with new 8-byte alignment checking in libfdt and another
> fix for NULL pointer check that is missing in libfdt.
>
> This depends on the following patches sent separately, which fix
> various 8-byte alignment problems in the code base:
>
> - boot: android: Always use 8-byte aligned DT with libfdt
> - test/py: android: Point fdt command to aligned addresses
> - test/py: Use aligned address for overlays in 'extension' test
> - sandbox: Fix DT compiler address warnings in sandbox DTs
> - sandbox: Fix DT compiler pin warnings in sandbox DTs
> - boot: Assure FDT is always at 8-byte aligned address
> - arm: qemu: Eliminate fdt_high and initrd_high misuse
> - efi_loader: Assure fitImage from capsule is used from 8-byte aligned address
> - MIPS: Assure end of U-Boot is at 8-byte aligned offset
So, taking a look at the test branch you pointed me at, my big concern
is size growth. On imx8mp_dhcom_drc02 (where we're already LTO'ing),
with the CI gcc-14.2.0 toolchain full U-Boot grows by more than 6KiB and
SPL by a bit more than 2KiB. This is a bit of a worst-case, imx8mp_navqp
is a bit more than 3KiB / 548 bytes, with the average feeling like
~4KiB/1KiB for aarch64.
I know there are some configuration choices to make libfdt be more
risk-adverse and perform less sanity checks, but I also think we had
fully enabled them.
Frustratingly I think this is why we ended up with:
commit 088bbc1efa8c1efe8e2714b9640055ce984aec93
Author: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>
Date: Fri Mar 28 17:31:15 2025 +0100
dtc: introduce label relative path references
Since introduction of OF_UPSTREAM flag, U-Boot's dtc must be able
to compile Kernel's device tree.
Since kernel commit 7de129f5389b ("ARM: dts: stm32: stm32mp151a-prtt1l:
Fix QSPI configuration"), label relative path references has been
introduced. These label relative path references is not supported
by current U-Boot dtc version 1.5.0: (see mailing list discussion [1]).
In order to support such label relative patch references
adds following commit from upstream DTC tree:
commit 651410e54cb9 ("util: introduce xstrndup helper")
commit ec7986e682cf ("dtc: introduce label relative path references")
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250115144428.GZ3476@bill-the-cat/T/
Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Rather than a full-resync for the last time we needed a feature found
upstream.
There are things we *need* like to be 8-byte aligned and also the
phandle resolution thing I believe inspired your investigations here,
but I don't know if we can take the whole sync. Or maybe needing to work
with upstream to shrink down some parts, I'm unsure.
--
Tom
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-13 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-13 12:21 [PATCH 0/3] Synchronize DTC to 1.7.2 Marek Vasut
2025-11-13 12:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] dm: core: Check ofnode_to_offset() return value Marek Vasut
2025-11-13 19:33 ` Simon Glass
2025-11-13 21:51 ` Marek Vasut
2025-11-13 22:46 ` Simon Glass
2025-11-14 5:17 ` Marek Vasut
2025-11-14 14:36 ` Tom Rini
2025-11-16 0:16 ` Marek Vasut
2025-11-16 14:13 ` Tom Rini
2025-11-16 21:28 ` Marek Vasut
2025-11-17 14:14 ` Tom Rini
2025-11-13 12:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] scripts/dtc: Update to upstream version v1.7.2-35-g52f07dcca47c Marek Vasut
2025-11-13 12:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] libfdt: Check fdt_offset_ptr() return value unconditionally Marek Vasut
2025-11-13 19:33 ` Simon Glass
2025-11-13 21:48 ` Marek Vasut
2025-11-13 23:34 ` Simon Glass
2025-11-20 4:20 ` Marek Vasut
2025-11-13 17:57 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2025-11-13 18:40 ` [PATCH 0/3] Synchronize DTC to 1.7.2 Marek Vasut
2025-11-13 18:49 ` Tom Rini
2025-11-13 19:32 ` Simon Glass
2025-11-15 23:23 ` Marek Vasut
2025-11-16 14:11 ` Tom Rini
2025-11-16 21:48 ` Marek Vasut
2025-11-17 18:40 ` Tom Rini
2025-11-19 21:31 ` Marek Vasut
2025-11-20 15:54 ` Tom Rini
2025-11-20 20:14 ` Marek Vasut
2025-11-21 19:55 ` Tom Rini
2025-12-02 17:46 ` Marek Vasut
2025-12-02 18:06 ` Tom Rini
2025-12-02 18:35 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251113175700.GM6688@bill-the-cat \
--to=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=adrianox@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew.goodbody@linaro.org \
--cc=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
--cc=cfsworks@gmail.com \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org \
--cc=patrice.chotard@foss.st.com \
--cc=sjg@chromium.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
--cc=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).