From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [85.214.62.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4E71E7E0C0 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2026 10:16:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h2850616.stratoserver.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA75839A5; Mon, 9 Feb 2026 11:16:44 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=dolcini.it Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=dolcini.it header.i=@dolcini.it header.b="n9XVH3Ai"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by phobos.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 109) id 4CF4183BC9; Mon, 9 Feb 2026 11:16:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail11.truemail.it (mail11.truemail.it [217.194.8.81]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 045738397D for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2026 11:16:40 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=dolcini.it Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=francesco@dolcini.it Received: from francesco-nb (93-49-2-63.ip317.fastwebnet.it [93.49.2.63]) by mail11.truemail.it (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8D7C41FAE6; Mon, 9 Feb 2026 11:16:39 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dolcini.it; s=default; t=1770632200; bh=Bii9vLH5I4yAOZwopnM/srD6KD7xSPQZPfRPGyNJZQo=; h=From:To:Subject; b=n9XVH3AiQ7SikafQWum9JnQ0+s/d2eSJyn7HG5SdMpnF1FPj+/GMsSAtGs4aWqDsg 8/dPdnVPBB2qZvG+IkAjP5csNHqrJC6Q+CNII9P+Xh9w6PYUB1SrXuZ+1fffk+iew8 RpTdpgUQDPrZ1i3mH0nuUc/pCpICX8TbxUNYfPCtuymIDlUtMx+MdnXUHBTzJ0mAxa vYsed8gb+YgAP6sqPC0NpBKp+QoJUtm3HXrSuQ2UTrqQG9v0fBRV9Jtvnfp99H9ffM pLcaWidA7cst+IfOMx7Hha0LWXNK5lvkok7jJbElKcIJYmbTsgGWhCdiN+zBNSSVgx YteaGM4p5Qibw== Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 11:16:35 +0100 From: Francesco Dolcini To: Suhaas Joshi Cc: Francesco Dolcini , Anshul Dalal , Bryan Brattlof , u-boot@lists.denx.de, trini@konsulko.com, vigneshr@ti.com, n-francis@ti.com, s-tripathi1@ti.com, k-malarvizhi@ti.com, kamlesh@ti.com, vishalm@ti.com, d.schultz@phytec.de, w.egorov@phytec.de, ggiordano@phytec.com Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] Verdin AM62/62P not booting with 42b3ee7fa524 Message-ID: <20260209101635.GA28492@francesco-nb> References: <20260209083855.GA9367@francesco-nb> <20260209084529.GA12200@francesco-nb> <20260209100851.abaf46pr77uq46zi@ula0507357> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260209100851.abaf46pr77uq46zi@ula0507357> X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.8 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 03:38:51PM +0530, Suhaas Joshi wrote: > On 09:45-20260209, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > > + Bryan, Anshul > > > > On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 09:38:55AM +0100, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > > > Verdin AM62 and AM62P are not booting anymore with U-Boot 42b3ee7fa524, > > > everything was fine with b5213bbfdcb1. > > > > > > Looking at the commits between the two revision, I would say that the > > > issue is with this series https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260127081652.506357-1-s-joshi@ti.com/ > > > > We have also commit 3382d75f7a6c ("arch: arm: dts: k3: refactor common > > nodes to k3-*-r5.dtsi") that might be the root cause for this issue. > > > > Hi Francesco. Unfortunately, I don't have Verdin line of boards with me, > so I cannot reproduce this issue. This is also why I wasn't able to test > my series on my end and had requested board-specific maintainers do the > same. > > Since I don't have the boards, could you run the following test to help > us ascertain which of the 2 suspected commits actually broke the boot? > > * First drop my AM625 Verdin patch, and compile and copy the binaries, > and boot. > * Then let my patch remain in the tree, and remove Anshul's refactor > patch, and try the same thing again. > > This could help us ascertain which commit broke boot, and we can try > fixing from that commit. Sure, I can bisect it. Do this difference in the logs Failed to set clock rates for '/a53@0': -22 vs Failed to set clock rates for '/a53@0': -61 ring any bell? Francesco