From: Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>
To: Huang Jianan <jnhuang95@gmail.com>, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Cc: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, u-boot@lists.denx.de,
Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] fs/erofs: major alignment fixes
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 14:42:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260323134305.2675822-1-mwalle@kernel.org> (raw)
Throughout the whole fs code, large (4k) data buffers are allocated
on the stack. While it is not nice, to allocate that large buffers on
the stack, there is a much more fundamental problem: it's not
aligned.
This will result in a huge amount of cache misaligned messages on
arm32 SoCs, e.g.:
CACHE: Misaligned operation at range [x, y]
While this is more or less a warning, as it will only invalidate
surrounding data, DMA is more of a problem. Some DMA controllers
have address restrictions and because of that there is
ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN. Thus as a first fix, move all the data buffers
from the stack to the heap with proper alignment.
There are still some misalignment warnings. I've traced it to
fs_devread(). Most of the calls to blk_dread() will pass an aligned
buffer. But the main blk_dread() will just pass buf, which might
have previously been advanced by readlen. Not sure how that could be
fixed in an elegant way. The simplest would probably be just a
bounce buffer, which there is already one in blk_read() if
BOUNCE_BUFFERS is enabled. But I haven't managed to get that
working. And now, I'm running out of time.
Michael Walle (4):
fs/erofs: align the malloc'ed data
fs/erofs: allocate data buffers on heap with alignment (1/3)
fs/erofs: allocate data buffers on heap with alignment (2/3)
fs/erofs: allocate data buffers on heap with alignment (3/3)
fs/erofs/data.c | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
fs/erofs/fs.c | 14 ++++-
fs/erofs/internal.h | 5 +-
fs/erofs/namei.c | 47 ++++++++++++-----
fs/erofs/super.c | 40 ++++++++++----
fs/erofs/zmap.c | 61 +++++++++++++++------
6 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
--
2.47.3
next reply other threads:[~2026-03-23 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-23 13:42 Michael Walle [this message]
2026-03-23 13:42 ` [PATCH 1/4] fs/erofs: align the malloc'ed data Michael Walle
2026-03-23 14:41 ` Gao Xiang
2026-03-23 15:08 ` Michael Walle
2026-03-23 15:13 ` Gao Xiang
2026-03-23 13:42 ` [PATCH 2/4] fs/erofs: allocate data buffers on heap with alignment (1/3) Michael Walle
2026-03-23 13:42 ` [PATCH 3/4] fs/erofs: allocate data buffers on heap with alignment (2/3) Michael Walle
2026-03-23 13:42 ` [PATCH 4/4] fs/erofs: allocate data buffers on heap with alignment (3/3) Michael Walle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260323134305.2675822-1-mwalle@kernel.org \
--to=mwalle@kernel.org \
--cc=jnhuang95@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox