From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [85.214.62.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC3F2E9A744 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 09:19:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h2850616.stratoserver.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F03A580212; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 10:19:06 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=dolcini.it Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=dolcini.it header.i=@dolcini.it header.b="tVp60JMG"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by phobos.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 109) id DCF4D8352B; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 10:19:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail11.truemail.it (mail11.truemail.it [IPv6:2001:4b7e:0:8::81]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA7A180087 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 10:19:03 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=dolcini.it Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=francesco@dolcini.it Received: from francesco-nb (248.201.173.83.static.wline.lns.sme.cust.swisscom.ch [83.173.201.248]) by mail11.truemail.it (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0FA45275B6; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 10:19:02 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dolcini.it; s=default; t=1774343942; bh=UrTXau5OXCKaUdGB9DQobgaqy4zD4VN5JVKUn1woZhU=; h=From:To:Subject; b=tVp60JMGIH5px58bPVuAEZgAtXnuTE1Nb7JDR01FUPsqn5KH7L8iyQNhkuWuBkXAt jDhlCl1Cxbh6z49mlDVlYmvkZ5lDuz5HeMrnNkdHVM7f9xtVOaRyi8J6xvff+DnHVg rKY8QxXVFxQA5cxSFeK92CGo9p4UmjZwLjy9sB/fz9QiFtWzBqyZLszOtolyyeCPus TQkQm66ZGFTz39OKNlsREUdmiV0erjGI4byupA3KOsfmBDgvo5bYGG6hnDwHhO4/E5 hU2TfZyFxrLLnThR3OLcD8HewL2L+ujq7Y+ZRcXhnhB4wQoagRR5iEhiogi51ddVNb /UN+6ooCjhnXg== Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 10:18:58 +0100 From: Francesco Dolcini To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" Cc: Tom Rini , "u-boot@lists.denx.de" , Manoj Sai , "matteo.lisi" , Teresa Remmet , Fabio Estevam , Marco Franchi , Alifer Moraes , "Lukas F. Hartmann" , Patrick Wildt , Heiko Thiery , Marek Vasut , Francesco Dolcini , "upstream@lists.phytec.de" Subject: Re: U-Boot and legacy SPL power control on modern platforms Message-ID: <20260324091858.GA22537@francesco-nb> References: <20260320214518.GD502704@bill-the-cat> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.8 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean On Sun, Mar 22, 2026 at 12:26:46PM +0000, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote: > > SPL_POWER_LEGACY symbol. Can the maintainers please update these > > to use DM_PMIC, DM_REGULATOR (and SPL variants) as needed so > > that they use the modern architecture, or let me know what's missing > > here? Thanks! > > If board maintainers would work on the migration, that would be great. > If not, I will give a check, but I not have the board to test. Thanks Peng, I have seen the patch on Verdin and I'll test/review the code. Francesco