Re: [PATCH 2/2] dtc: libfdt: Introduce a can_assume check in fdt_check_full

[Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1130 bytes --]

On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 11:41:26PM -0500, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> On 2026-05-26T20:19:26, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> > dtc: libfdt: Introduce a can_assume check in fdt_check_full
> >
> > The current upstream method of having a function omit various tests is
> > to use the can_assume macro. Take the logic we had previously been using
> > and instead make it a can_assume(PERFECT) check within fdt_check_full
> > itself.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
> >
> > scripts/dtc/libfdt/fdt_check.c | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> > diff --git a/scripts/dtc/libfdt/fdt_check.c b/scripts/dtc/libfdt/fdt_check.c
> > @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ int fdt_check_full(const void *fdt, size_t bufsize)
> >       const char *propname;
> >       bool expect_end = false;
> >
> > +     if (can_assume(PERFECT))
> > +             return 0;
> 
> Just to note that this of course affects image-fit.c too, so FITs are
> no-longer validated if used in SPL. People can change the mask though.

There's no functional change to what we have today, actually, really.

-- 
Tom

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]