From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Zac Wheeler <zac.wheeler@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 16:32:32 -0700
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] AT91 Header File Clarification
In-Reply-To: <1207347950.3762.3.camel@voyager.dsnet>
References: <206b9e70804041332w695212f3me41cfa8f7f182f11@mail.gmail.com>
	<1207347950.3762.3.camel@voyager.dsnet>
Message-ID: <206b9e70804041632o391fc02fscac580e81b4bec7c@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Stelian Pop <stelian@popies.net> wrote:
>
>  Le vendredi 04 avril 2008 ? 13:32 -0700, Zac Wheeler a ?crit :
>
> > I have a question about the arrangement of include files for the
>  > at91sam9 family.
>  >
>  > Is the intention that asm/arch/at91_xxx.h be applicable for all
>  > at91sam9 microcontrollers, or should they be broken down into subarch
>  > folders (e.g. asm/arch/at91sam9261/at91_pmc.h)?
>
>  They are supposed to be shareable for all at91sam microcontrollers, in
>  the same way it's done in Linux.

So should things like AT91_ECC as defined in at91sam960.h be
AT91SAM9260_ECC instead or moved to an at91_sys.h file? It seems
somewhat dangerous to define an AT91_ in a AT91SAM9260-specific file.

Sorry for my lack of understanding if I'm missing the point.

Zac