From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Zac Wheeler <zac.wheeler@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 19:08:31 -0700
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] AT91 Header File Clarification
In-Reply-To: <1207347950.3762.3.camel@voyager.dsnet>
References: <206b9e70804041332w695212f3me41cfa8f7f182f11@mail.gmail.com>
	<1207347950.3762.3.camel@voyager.dsnet>
Message-ID: <206b9e70804041908m4f3e5b7eyf3b81788d8a24bdf@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Stelian Pop <stelian@popies.net> wrote:
>
>  Le vendredi 04 avril 2008 ? 13:32 -0700, Zac Wheeler a ?crit :
>
> > I have a question about the arrangement of include files for the
>  > at91sam9 family.
>  >
>  > Is the intention that asm/arch/at91_xxx.h be applicable for all
>  > at91sam9 microcontrollers, or should they be broken down into subarch
>  > folders (e.g. asm/arch/at91sam9261/at91_pmc.h)?
>
>  They are supposed to be shareable for all at91sam microcontrollers, in
>  the same way it's done in Linux.
>
>
>  > I am trying to bring up the at91sam9261 on a custom board a little
>  > ahead of what appears to be the schedule for the at91sam9261ek and I
>  > want to try to be compatible with the existing format.
>
>  I'm working on support for the at91sam9261, I will probably have a patch
>  for the end of the next week. Hopefully you can wait until then. If not,
>  please go ahead.
>
>
>  > I haven't done
>  > a lot of comparisons between 9260/9261/9263, but for some things (e.g.
>  > at91_lcd.h)
>
>  There is no such file in u-boot, nor linux iirc. There is a atmel_lcdc.h
>  in Linux (and I plan importing it into U-Boot, but later...).

There is an at91_lcdc.h in Linux, but you're right, atmel_lcdc.h
appears to be the one that is used for the actual driver.