From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko Stuebner Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2019 21:49:25 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 6/9] pinctrl: rockchip: Add common rockchip pinctrl driver In-Reply-To: <7CA45F3C-F6E4-4E49-BF41-C2E9DCC66519@theobroma-systems.com> References: <20190102125105.25734-1-david.wu@rock-chips.com> <9566905.BjVVr1PO9Y@phil> <7CA45F3C-F6E4-4E49-BF41-C2E9DCC66519@theobroma-systems.com> Message-ID: <2424928.rjXneoo3dz@phil> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Philipp, Am Sonntag, 6. Januar 2019, 19:57:42 CET schrieb Philipp Tomsich: > > On 05.01.2019, at 18:27, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 2. Januar 2019, 14:00:55 CET schrieb David Wu: > >> Use this driver to fit all Rockchip SOCs and to support > >> the desired pinctrl configuration via DTS. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: David Wu > >> --- > >> > >> Changes in v2: > >> - Remove px30, rk2928, rk3066*. > >> - Split it to multiple files for the relevant per-SoC data structures. > > > > Moving so nicely close to the Linux pinctrl driver is way cool. And while > > I haven't looked in that much detail, this looks nice, so > > > > Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner > > > > Out of curiosity, why did you remove px30, rk2928 and rk3066 support? > > I'm still hoping to support those at some point (someone was working > > on rk3066 uboot support for example last year or so), so having the > > pinctrl support already present might encourage things? > > Or was that a review-request from v1? > > I requested to not have any drivers includeed for chips that are not > supported in U-Boot. Each additional pinctrl-driver should then come > in once the respective SoC is added (i.e. I’d like to have the pinctrl > driver part of the respective enablement series)… fair enough, thanks for the heads up :-) Heiko