From: Andrey Volkov <avolkov@varma-el.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] BDI vs. Lauterbach
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 22:04:19 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <245999876.20060410220419@varma-el.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060410163800.B753735260B@atlas.denx.de>
On Monday, April 10, 2006, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Andrey,
> in message <1618325846.20060410201725@varma-el.com> you wrote:
>>
>> > This does not mean anything. I haven't seen a single case where the
>> > network speed was the limiting factor. Shuffeling the data through
>> > the JTAG is usually much slower.
>> Not always. As ex.: allowable MPC5200 JTAG's clock is ... 25 MHz,
>> clock of 10 Mbit eth is ... + tcp stack overhead. And now we run
>> memory dump command and measure.
> But the 25 MHz also includes a LOT of JTAG communication overhead. I
> think you won't get even close to a raw 10 Mbps data rate, but I have
> to admit that I never actually measured it yet. Did you really
> measure this? For example, what difference do you get when you
> connect your Lauterbach to a 10 Mbps port vs. a 100 Mbps port?
> [This is a serious question; I have never been able to run such a
> test myself yet.]
Unfortunately, but I have not access to a Lauterbach anymore (as I say,
I work with it 3 years ago), so I couldn't run this test too :(.
snip..
--
Regards,
Andrey Volkov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-10 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-10 12:38 [U-Boot-Users] BDI vs. Lauterbach David Snowdon
2006-04-10 13:00 ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-10 15:32 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-04-10 16:17 ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-10 16:38 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-04-10 18:04 ` Andrey Volkov [this message]
2006-04-11 6:06 ` [U-Boot-Users] " Wolfram Wadepohl
2006-04-10 16:35 ` [U-Boot-Users] " llandre
2006-04-10 17:58 ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-10 19:48 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-04-10 22:10 ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-11 10:41 ` Andreas Schweigstill
2006-04-12 7:54 ` David Snowdon
2006-04-12 10:07 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-04-13 6:17 ` David Snowdon
2006-04-13 6:43 ` Marco Cavallini
2006-04-10 17:00 ` Marco Cavallini
2006-04-10 18:20 ` Frank
2006-04-10 22:04 ` Andrey Volkov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-04-10 13:02 Woodruff, Richard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=245999876.20060410220419@varma-el.com \
--to=avolkov@varma-el.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox