public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrey Volkov <avolkov@varma-el.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] BDI vs. Lauterbach
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 22:04:19 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <245999876.20060410220419@varma-el.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060410163800.B753735260B@atlas.denx.de>

On Monday, April 10, 2006, Wolfgang Denk wrote:

> Dear Andrey,

> in message <1618325846.20060410201725@varma-el.com> you wrote:
>> 
>> > This does not mean anything. I haven't seen a single case  where  the
>> > network  speed  was  the limiting factor. Shuffeling the data through
>> > the JTAG is usually much slower.
>> Not always. As ex.:  allowable MPC5200 JTAG's clock is ... 25 MHz,
>> clock of 10 Mbit eth is ... + tcp stack overhead. And now we run
>> memory dump command and measure.

> But the 25 MHz also includes a LOT of JTAG communication overhead.  I
> think you won't get even close to a raw 10 Mbps data rate, but I have
> to  admit  that  I  never  actually  measured  it yet. Did you really
> measure this? For example,  what  difference  do  you  get  when  you
> connect your Lauterbach to a 10 Mbps port vs. a 100 Mbps port?
> [This is a serious question; I have never been able  to  run  such  a
> test myself yet.]
Unfortunately, but I have not access to a Lauterbach anymore (as I say,
I work with it 3 years ago), so I couldn't run this test too :(.

snip..

-- 
Regards,
Andrey Volkov

  reply	other threads:[~2006-04-10 18:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-04-10 12:38 [U-Boot-Users] BDI vs. Lauterbach David Snowdon
2006-04-10 13:00 ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-10 15:32   ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-04-10 16:17     ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-10 16:38       ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-04-10 18:04         ` Andrey Volkov [this message]
2006-04-11  6:06     ` [U-Boot-Users] " Wolfram Wadepohl
2006-04-10 16:35   ` [U-Boot-Users] " llandre
2006-04-10 17:58     ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-10 19:48       ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-04-10 22:10         ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-11 10:41     ` Andreas Schweigstill
2006-04-12  7:54       ` David Snowdon
2006-04-12 10:07         ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-04-13  6:17           ` David Snowdon
2006-04-13  6:43             ` Marco Cavallini
2006-04-10 17:00   ` Marco Cavallini
2006-04-10 18:20     ` Frank
2006-04-10 22:04       ` Andrey Volkov
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-04-10 13:02 Woodruff, Richard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=245999876.20060410220419@varma-el.com \
    --to=avolkov@varma-el.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox