From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?Q?Beno=C3=AEt_Th=C3=A9baudeau?= Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:25:33 +0100 (CET) Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v7 16/19] arm926ejs: Remove deprecated and now unused NAND SPL In-Reply-To: <20130217170800.2e998a3d@lilith> References: <1360961665-10693-1-git-send-email-benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com> <1360961665-10693-16-git-send-email-benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com> <230704286.1528558.1361116297610.JavaMail.root@advansee.com> <20130217170454.0d9685cf@lilith> <20130217170800.2e998a3d@lilith> Message-ID: <246179297.1528928.1361118333217.JavaMail.root@advansee.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Sunday, February 17, 2013 5:08:00 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Albert, > > On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:04:54 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD > wrote: > > > Hi Beno?t, > > > > On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:51:37 +0100 (CET), Beno?t Th?baudeau > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Albert, Tom, Zhong, > > > > > > On Friday, February 15, 2013 9:54:22 PM, Beno?t Th?baudeau wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Beno?t Th?baudeau > > > > --- > > > > Changes in v7: None > > > > Changes in v6: > > > > - New patch. > > > > > > > > Changes in v5: None > > > > Changes in v4: None > > > > Changes in v3: None > > > > Changes in v2: None > > > > > > > > arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/start.S | 10 ---------- > > > > 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-) > > > > > > I would like to get your feedback regarding the status of the Samsung > > > SMDK6400 > > > board: > > > - It is not in boards.cfg, so, according to commit 1285a28, support for > > > it > > > should already have been removed a long time ago. It also seems to be > > > the > > > only board remaining in the main Makefile. > > > - It uses the deprecated NAND SPL. > > > - MAKEALL does not test its build, which has been broken for a while. > > > - If it were removed or fixed, ARM1176's start.S' relocate_code() could > > > be made > > > identical to all the other implementations of this function, so all > > > this > > > duplicated code could be moved to a common location like crt0.S. > > > Besides > > > that, it would be possible to completely get rid of the legacy NAND > > > SPL on > > > ARM. > > > > > > I have no intention of fixing this board, but dropping it and cleaning up > > > ARM > > > after that would be easy. > > > > Cc:ing the board maintainers, as they should be the first ones to be > > asked whether they intend to bring the board into boards.cfg and fix > > it, or whether it should be dropped. > > Scratch this: correct maintainer CC:ed now Yes, I had already Cc'ed Zhong. > (how about changing the > MAINTAINERS file format so that we can tell for sure without having to > ceck the first entry?) That would be good. E.g., a colon could be added after the last e-mail address of each group of board maintainers, or the empty line between the e-mail addresses and the boards could be removed. Best regards, Beno?t