From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Zedeck Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:36:39 -0800 (PST) Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] add explicit bbt creation to commandline In-Reply-To: <27568153.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <20080706080456.GF4167@prithivi.gnumonks.org> <27558231.post@talk.nabble.com> <20100212170411.GA21800@loki.buserror.net> <27566937.post@talk.nabble.com> <4B759454.8070906@freescale.com> <27567768.post@talk.nabble.com> <4B75A3BA.8000501@freescale.com> <27568153.post@talk.nabble.com> Message-ID: <27568365.post@talk.nabble.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Steven Zedeck wrote: > > >> No, I mean in the NAND driver for your specific hardware >> (fsl_elbc_nand.c, mxc_nand.c, ndfc_nand.c, etc). > > You have been so helpful. I looked at the mtd/nand/Makefile and the only > file that's included besides the nand* files is: > > COBJS-y += fsl_upm.o > > However, in that code: > #if defined(CONFIG_CMD_NAND) && defined(CONFIG_NAND_FSL_UPM) > > But I don't see CONFIG_NAND_FSL_UPM defined anywhere. It seems that this > file really isn't being used. > > How do I determine what hadrware driver its using? I'm sure this sounds > like a dumb question. Do all the drivers live in drivers/mtd/nand/.... ? > > thanks, > Steve > > I think we are just using the base/generic mtd nand driver. Is that possible? thanks, Steve -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/-PATCH--add-explicit-bbt-creation-to-commandline-tp18299804p27568365.html Sent from the Uboot - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.