From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 12:53:05 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] sunxi: Increase SPL header size to 64 bytes
 to avoid code corruption
In-Reply-To: <575131FB.1060005@web.de>
References: <1463188406-4707-1-git-send-email-siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
 <5739996A.7090806@web.de> <c0a3568c-9308-8541-8e75-5c5f1d38780c@redhat.com>
 <20160602175721.4a41bd20@i7> <575131FB.1060005@web.de>
Message-ID: <2a4fc4ba-9448-e871-460f-c5dc70ea1fc5@redhat.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi,

On 03-06-16 09:30, Bernhard Nortmann wrote:
> Am 02.06.2016 um 16:57 schrieb Siarhei Siamashka:
>> On Mon, 16 May 2016 19:52:33 +0200
>> Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> [...]
>>> Other then that worry, I see no problem with adding a
>>> fel_script_length, Siarhei what is your opinion on this ?
>> I personally have no objections.
>>
>
> Does it make sense if I submit a patch for this, or should we simply
> squash that one-line change into your "Store the device tree name in
> the SPL header" series?

This seems like an unrelated change to me and as such should be
a separate patch.

Regards,

Hans