From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [85.214.62.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8225CE7A81 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 15:01:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h2850616.stratoserver.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C3986C37; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 17:01:16 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ltec.ch Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Received: by phobos.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 109) id C2F8386D44; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 16:56:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.ltec.ch (mail.ltec.ch [95.143.48.181]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D276486B36 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 16:56:11 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ltec.ch Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=fb@ltec.ch Received: from nebula.ltec ([172.27.11.2] helo=[172.27.11.35]) by mail.ltec.ch with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qkn04-00CsDy-91; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 16:55:52 +0200 Message-ID: <2a727cd4-bbda-409e-8d0e-1aafba182873@ltec.ch> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 16:55:52 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/38] spl: Use CONFIG_SPL... instead of CONFIG_..._SPL_... Content-Language: en-US To: Simon Glass , U-Boot Mailing List Cc: Tom Rini , Marek Vasut , Marcel Ziswiler , Martyn Welch , Svyatoslav Ryhel , Adam Ford , Alison Wang , Allen Martin , Ariel D'Alessandro , Chee Hong Ang , Chin-Liang See , Dave Gerlach , Dinh Nguyen , Fabio Estevam , Green Wan , Heiko Thiery , Ian Ray , Jaehoon Chung , Jan Kiszka , =?UTF-8?Q?Javier_Mart=C3=ADnez_Canillas?= , Leo Yu-Chi Liang , Michal Simek , Mike Looijmans , Nicolas Ferre , Oleksandr Suvorov , Oliver Graute , Palmer Dabbelt , Parthiban Nallathambi , Paul Walmsley , Peter.Chubb@data61.csiro.au, Philip Oberfichtner , Quentin Schulz , Raffaele RECALCATI , Roger Quadros , Stefan Roese , Teresa Remmet , Tianrui Wei , Tim Harvey , Uri Mashiach , Yanhong Wang , kernel@puri.sm, uboot-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com References: <20230924192536.1812799-1-sjg@chromium.org> <20230924192536.1812799-2-sjg@chromium.org> From: Felix Brack In-Reply-To: <20230924192536.1812799-2-sjg@chromium.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 17:01:15 +0200 X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.8 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean Hi Simon, On 24.09.23 21:24, Simon Glass wrote: > We like to put the SPL first so it is clear that it relates to SPL. Rename > various malloc-related options which have crept in, to stick to this > convention. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass > Reviewed-by: Marcel Ziswiler > Reviewed-by: Martyn Welch > Reviewed-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel > --- > > (no changes since v1) > ..... I just tried to apply the patch to master for testing and got the following result: error: patch failed: configs/am335x_baltos_defconfig:18 error: configs/am335x_baltos_defconfig: patch does not apply error: patch failed: configs/am335x_igep003x_defconfig:20 error: configs/am335x_igep003x_defconfig: patch does not apply error: patch failed: configs/dh_imx6_defconfig:39 error: configs/dh_imx6_defconfig: patch does not apply error: patch failed: configs/starfive_visionfive2_defconfig:47 error: configs/starfive_visionfive2_defconfig: patch does not apply For what I want to test (changes for PDU001 board) this doesn't matter however. I'm just not sure: should I go ahead with testing or wait for an updated patch? regards Felix