From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: krrish53 Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 08:11:16 -0800 (PST) Subject: [U-Boot] A question in lowlevel_init.S In-Reply-To: <4D3AAF18.1080207@emk-elektronik.de> References: <30734554.post@talk.nabble.com> <4D3A8667.7000609@free.fr> <4D3A89BA.7070303@emk-elektronik.de> <4D3AAA41.3080601@eukrea.com> <4D3AAF18.1080207@emk-elektronik.de> Message-ID: <30737145.post@talk.nabble.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Sorry for not mentioning the file name. its here uboot/arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/lowlevel_init.S and also in uboot/board/samsung/smdk2410/lowlevel_init.S Thanks for all your responses so far people. Reinhard Meyer wrote: > > Dear Eric B?nard wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 22/01/2011 08:39, Reinhard Meyer wrote: >>> I am not aware of any > ADD: working >>> AT91SAM9xxx systems right now that uses low-level init, it >>> would only make sense for those that boot directly from NOR, without >>> AT91BOOTSTRAP involved. >> >> cpu9260 (at91sam9260 / 9g20 based) is using low-level init as it boots >> from >> NOR and is not using at91bootstrap. > > Those CPUs are broken since relocation was introduced. It would be nice to > see > them demonstrated working out of NOR with low level init enabled... > > Best Regards, > Reinhard > _______________________________________________ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot at lists.denx.de > http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/A-question-in-lowlevel_init.S-tp30734554p30737145.html Sent from the Uboot - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.