[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] arm1136: Fix enable_caches()

["Benoît Thébaudeau" <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>]

Hi Albert,

On Friday, October 5, 2012 8:23:14 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote;
> On Thu, 4 Oct 2012 22:04:02 +0200 (CEST), Beno?t Th?baudeau
> <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com> wrote:
> 
> > enable_caches() did not enable icache if CONFIG_SYS_ICACHE_OFF was
> > not defined
> > but CONFIG_SYS_DCACHE_OFF was.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Beno?t Th?baudeau <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
> > Cc: Albert Aribaud <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
> > ---
> > This patch supersedes http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/177263/ .
> > 
> > Changes for v2:
> >  - Move enable_caches() outside of the main #if in order to fix
> >  this icache
> >    issue rather than doing only #if cosmetic cleanup.
> > 
> >  .../arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/cpu.c                     |   22
> >  +++++++++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git u-boot-arm-1dfc916.orig/arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/cpu.c
> > u-boot-arm-1dfc916/arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/cpu.c
> > index b98e3d9..32a4c24 100644
> > --- u-boot-arm-1dfc916.orig/arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/cpu.c
> > +++ u-boot-arm-1dfc916/arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/cpu.c
> > @@ -141,16 +141,6 @@ void flush_cache(unsigned long start, unsigned
> > long size)
> >  	flush_dcache_range(start, start + size);
> >  }
> >  
> > -void enable_caches(void)
> > -{
> > -#ifndef CONFIG_SYS_ICACHE_OFF
> > -	icache_enable();
> > -#endif
> > -#ifndef CONFIG_SYS_DCACHE_OFF
> > -	dcache_enable();
> > -#endif
> > -}
> > -
> >  #else /* #ifndef CONFIG_SYS_DCACHE_OFF */
> >  void invalidate_dcache_all(void)
> >  {
> > @@ -172,3 +162,15 @@ void flush_cache(unsigned long start, unsigned
> > long size)
> >  {
> >  }
> >  #endif /* #ifndef CONFIG_SYS_DCACHE_OFF */
> > +
> > +#if !defined(CONFIG_SYS_ICACHE_OFF) ||
> > !defined(CONFIG_SYS_DCACHE_OFF)
> > +void enable_caches(void)
> > +{
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_SYS_ICACHE_OFF
> > +	icache_enable();
> > +#endif
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_SYS_DCACHE_OFF
> > +	dcache_enable();
> > +#endif
> > +}
> > +#endif
> > 
> 
> Applied to u-boot-arm/next, thanks!

I know that's true (I had seen it applied), but it has vanished since then. Now,
I can't find it in u-boot-arm/next nor in u-boot-arm/master. This is perhaps
related to the rebase that you had to do at some point.

Best regards,
Beno?t