[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] rockchip: clk: rv1108: remove duplicate reset init

["Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>]

Hi Kever,

Am Donnerstag, 7. November 2019, 10:03:19 CET schrieb Kever Yang:
> On 2019/10/24 上午1:45, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > rockchip_reset_bind() already does the needed init for the reset
> > registers, only referenced the wrong cru structure.
> >
> > So we can get rid of the open-coded reset init and just fix
> > the correct cru reference.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> > ---
> >   drivers/clk/rockchip/clk_rv1108.c | 13 +------------
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk_rv1108.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk_rv1108.c
> > index 3ebb007fab..5dc31e1eb0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk_rv1108.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk_rv1108.c
> > @@ -698,22 +698,11 @@ static int rv1108_clk_bind(struct udevice *dev)
> >   	}
> >   
> >   #if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RESET_ROCKCHIP)
> > -	ret = offsetof(struct rk3368_cru, softrst_con[0]);
> > +	ret = offsetof(struct rv1108_cru, softrst_con[0]);
> >   	ret = rockchip_reset_bind(dev, ret, 13);
> >   	if (ret)
> >   		debug("Warning: software reset driver bind faile\n");
> >   #endif
> > -	ret = device_bind_driver_to_node(dev, "rockchip_reset", "reset",
> > -					 dev_ofnode(dev), &sf_child);
> 
> You can't just remove this blob of code, for there is a 'sysreset' 
> driver and a 'reset' driver, they are
> 
> different, so you should fix this part to be available 'sysreset' driver 
> so that the software can reset the SoC.

While there is a sysreset driver, it seems the rv1108 only did init
the softrst code here and not the sysreset at all.

So rockchip_reset_bind really only does the same as the remove
part of code. What I did see was that struct softreset_reg
still is defined in the rockchip clock.h and after this patch no-one
is using at all anymore. The rockchip_reset driver uses a different
struct altogether it seems.

Adding an appropriate sysreset driver for rv1108
should likely be a separate patch though.

Heiko


> > -	if (ret) {
> > -		debug("Warning: No rockchip reset driver: ret=%d\n", ret);
> > -	} else {
> > -		sf_priv = malloc(sizeof(struct softreset_reg));
> > -		sf_priv->sf_reset_offset = offsetof(struct rv1108_cru,
> > -						    softrst_con[0]);
> > -		sf_priv->sf_reset_num = 13;
> > -		sf_child->priv = sf_priv;
> > -	}
> >   
> >   	return 0;
> >   }
> 
> 
>