public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Gurevich <vag@paulidav.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [Patch]: A small patch for PPC4xx I2C driver
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 21:10:20 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E44913C.2020309@paulidav.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20030208031610.16267.qmail@web13801.mail.yahoo.com

Hi Frank,

This code has been copied verbatim from common/soft_i2c.c
and is identical to the implementations in other drivers like
cpu/mpc8260/i2c.c for example. It is done this way
because the prototype for i2c_write is

int i2c_write(uchar chip, uint addr, int alen, uchar *buffer, int len);

As you can see it requires an address of the buffer.

Since this is a real function and not a macro,
it will always work even if the actual parameter is
a literal, there is nothing wrong about it. Because the
prototype is

void i2c_reg_write(uchar i2c_addr, uchar reg, uchar val)

you don't have to pass an address of a value,
just the value itself.

If you look at the code that the compiler generates,
youll see it does the right thing (comments are mine):

(gdb) disas i2c_reg_write
Dump of assembler code for function i2c_reg_write:
# Make a stack frame
0x7fe8a80 <i2c_reg_write>:      stwu    r1,-16(r1)

# Store the return address on the stack
0x7fe8a84 <i2c_reg_write+4>:    mflr    r0
0x7fe8a88 <i2c_reg_write+8>:    stw     r0,20(r1)

# Store "val" on the stack
0x7fe8a8c <i2c_reg_write+12>:   stb     r5,8(r1)

# Set "alen" to 1
0x7fe8a90 <i2c_reg_write+16>:   li      r5,1

# set buffer = &val  (it is r1+8)
0x7fe8a94 <i2c_reg_write+20>:   addi    r6,r1,8

# set "len" to 1
0x7fe8a98 <i2c_reg_write+24>:   li      r7,1

# r3 has i2c_addr, that is chip
# r4 has reg
# i2c_write(chip, reg, 1, &val, 1)
0x7fe8a9c <i2c_reg_write+28>:   bl      0x7fe89a0 <i2c_write>

# restore the return address
0x7fe8aa0 <i2c_reg_write+32>:   lwz     r0,20(r1)
0x7fe8aa4 <i2c_reg_write+36>:   mtlr    r0

# remove the stack frame
0x7fe8aa8 <i2c_reg_write+40>:   addi    r1,r1,16

#return
0x7fe8aac <i2c_reg_write+44>:   blr
End of assembler dump.
(gdb)


Happy hacking,
Vladimir

  reply	other threads:[~2003-02-08  5:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-08  1:33 [U-Boot-Users] [Patch]: A small patch for PPC4xx I2C driver Vladimir Gurevich
2003-02-08  3:16 ` Frank
2003-02-08  5:10   ` Vladimir Gurevich [this message]
2003-02-08  9:45   ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-03-06 20:14 ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-03-06 20:25   ` Vladimir Gurevich
2003-03-06 20:47   ` [U-Boot-Users] MC68360 Port Reinhard Meyer
2003-03-06 21:49     ` Wolfgang Denk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3E44913C.2020309@paulidav.org \
    --to=vag@paulidav.org \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox