* [U-Boot-Users] walnut 405gp bridge setting
@ 2003-10-14 23:49 Xiaoshan Zuo
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Xiaoshan Zuo @ 2003-10-14 23:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
I have a customized walnut 405 gp board. While using u-boot the bridge
was not set correclty. The problem was that the bridge didn't respond to
requst. The problem was traced down to PCIC0_CMD[MA]=0 on the bridge.
The bit is set correclty in pci_405gp_init,
later it is got changed in pci_hose_scan_bus. It is not supposed to be
changed, as suggested by the comment below in the code. But this comment
contradict with function pci_hose_scan_bus which intentionly doesn't
skip the bridge. Removing #ifndef in pci_hose_scan_bus makes the bridge
work. My question is: is this a typo?
Where can I search for u-boot mailing list archive? linuxppc is very
easy to serach useful information. Sorry for the newbie question.
Thanks,
Xiaoshan
/*
* drivers/pci.c skips every host bridge but the 405GP since it could
* be set as an Adapter.
*
* I (Andrew May) don't know what we should do here, but I don't want
* the auto setup of a PCI device disabling what is done pci_405gp_init
* as has happened before.
*/
void pci_405gp_setup_bridge(struct pci_controller *hose, pci_dev_t dev,
struct pci_config_table *entry)
{
#ifdef DEBUG
printf("405gp_setup_bridge\n");
#endif
}
In drivers/pci.c:
int pci_hose_scan_bus(struct pci_controller *hose, int bus)
{
#ifndef CONFIG_405GP /* don't skip host bridge on ppc405gp */
/* Skip our host bridge */
if ( dev == PCI_BDF(hose->first_busno,0,0) )
continue;
#endif
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2003-10-14 23:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-10-14 23:49 [U-Boot-Users] walnut 405gp bridge setting Xiaoshan Zuo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox