From: George G. Davis <davis_g@comcast.net>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] omap5910
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 15:49:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FA17942.6080001@comcast.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <71555548814716479478431542AA5F8A058F73@dlee2k98.ent.ti.com>
Matthew,
I'll send you the BDI config files off list.
If anyone else would like a copy, just let me know.
--
Regards,
George
Woodruff, Richard wrote:
> I corresponded with a couple people who use bdi2000 on omap. If you read
> around on some news archives you will find them. George Davis is one who
> comes to mind.
>
> Regards,
>
> Richard W.
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Matthew S. McClintock [mailto:mattsm at arlut.utexas.edu]
>>Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 2:37 PM
>>To: Woodruff, Richard
>>Cc: u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>>Subject: RE: [U-Boot-Users] omap5910
>>
>>
>>Currently we are using the JTAG interface on our development
>>board with Code Composer on Windows. I would like to switch
>>to the BDI2000 I am used to debugging from with GNU tools on
>>Linux. Based on information from Albatron's web page there is
>>support for the ARM9TDMI cpu on the BDI2000, I am curious if
>>anyone has a bdi2000 config for this cpu?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Matthew
>>
>>On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 13:55, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
>>
>>>The 5910 for all practically purposes is the 1510. I have
>>
>>seen a doc
>>
>>>somewhere, not sure if I captured it or not.
>>>
>>>Basically, the difference is the way the parts are tested
>>
>>and sorted.
>>
>>>The 1510 parts are speed rated, and you can get up to a
>>
>>168MHx part.
>>
>>>The 5910 parts are not and its only guaranteed up to
>>
>>150MHz, but its
>>
>>>likely many will run at 168. The 1510 also "claims"
>>
>>support for some
>>
>>>functionality which the 5910 will not admit to having. The issue
>>>there is support and validation. 5910 parts will not be
>>
>>validated for
>>
>>>everything a 1510 will be.
>>>
>>>I use a mix of both types of chips on development boards.
>>
>>I use their
>>
>>>u-boot images interchangeably....I have set my timings back
>>
>>to 150MHz
>>
>>>as the thing I've been working on will get parts stamped as
>>
>>5910 not
>>
>>>1510.
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>
>>>Richard W.
>>>
>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: u-boot-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>[mailto:u-boot-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf
>>>>Of Matthew S. McClintock
>>>>Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 1:30 PM
>>>>To: u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>Subject: [U-Boot-Users] omap5910
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Has anyone done any work for the omap5910 cpu for u-boot? I
>>>>understand its extremely similar to the omap1510 cpu. Does
>>>>anyone have any code or pointers to how the two cpu's are
>>
>>different?
>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>Matthew
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>Matthew S. McClintock <mattsm@arlut.utexas.edu>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>>>This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
>>>>Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
>>>>help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
>>>>YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>U-Boot-Users mailing list
>>>>U-Boot-Users at lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>>This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does
>>>SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
>>>help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
>>>YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>U-Boot-Users mailing list
>>>U-Boot-Users at lists.sourceforge.net
>>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
>>
>>--
>>Matthew S. McClintock <mattsm@arlut.utexas.edu>
>>
>>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
> Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
> help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
> YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot-Users mailing list
> U-Boot-Users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-30 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-30 20:41 [U-Boot-Users] omap5910 Woodruff, Richard
2003-10-30 20:49 ` George G. Davis [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-30 19:55 Woodruff, Richard
2003-10-30 20:37 ` Matthew S. McClintock
2003-10-30 20:49 ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-10-30 21:00 ` George G. Davis
2003-10-30 19:29 Matthew S. McClintock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FA17942.6080001@comcast.net \
--to=davis_g@comcast.net \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox