[U-Boot-Users] omap5910

[U-Boot-Users] omap5910

[Matthew S. McClintock]

Has anyone done any work for the omap5910 cpu for u-boot? I understand
its extremely similar to the omap1510 cpu. Does anyone have any code or
pointers to how the two cpu's are different?

Thanks,
Matthew

-- 
Matthew S. McClintock <mattsm@arlut.utexas.edu>

[U-Boot-Users] omap5910

[Woodruff, Richard]

The 5910 for all practically purposes is the 1510.  I have seen a doc
somewhere, not sure if I captured it or not.

Basically, the difference is the way the parts are tested and sorted.  The
1510 parts are speed rated, and you can get up to a 168MHx part.  The 5910
parts are not and its only guaranteed up to 150MHz, but its likely many will
run at 168.  The 1510 also "claims" support for some functionality which the
5910 will not admit to having.  The issue there is support and validation.
5910 parts will not be validated for everything a 1510 will be.

I use a mix of both types of chips on development boards.  I use their
u-boot images interchangeably....I have set my timings back to 150MHz as the
thing I've been working on will get parts stamped as 5910 not 1510.

Regards,

Richard W.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: u-boot-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net 
> [mailto:u-boot-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf 
> Of Matthew S. McClintock
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 1:30 PM
> To: u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [U-Boot-Users] omap5910
> 
> 
> Has anyone done any work for the omap5910 cpu for u-boot? I 
> understand its extremely similar to the omap1510 cpu. Does 
> anyone have any code or pointers to how the two cpu's are different?
> 
> Thanks,
> Matthew
> 
> -- 
> Matthew S. McClintock <mattsm@arlut.utexas.edu>
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. 
> Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
> help you create better code?   SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
> YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ 
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot-Users mailing list
> U-Boot-Users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
> 

[U-Boot-Users] omap5910

[Matthew S. McClintock]

Currently we are using the JTAG interface on our development board with
Code Composer on Windows. I would like to switch to the BDI2000 I am
used to debugging from with GNU tools on Linux. Based on information
from Albatron's web page there is support for the ARM9TDMI cpu on the
BDI2000, I am curious if anyone has a bdi2000 config for this cpu?

Thanks,
Matthew

On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 13:55, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
> The 5910 for all practically purposes is the 1510.  I have seen a doc
> somewhere, not sure if I captured it or not.
> 
> Basically, the difference is the way the parts are tested and sorted.  The
> 1510 parts are speed rated, and you can get up to a 168MHx part.  The 5910
> parts are not and its only guaranteed up to 150MHz, but its likely many will
> run at 168.  The 1510 also "claims" support for some functionality which the
> 5910 will not admit to having.  The issue there is support and validation.
> 5910 parts will not be validated for everything a 1510 will be.
> 
> I use a mix of both types of chips on development boards.  I use their
> u-boot images interchangeably....I have set my timings back to 150MHz as the
> thing I've been working on will get parts stamped as 5910 not 1510.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Richard W.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: u-boot-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net 
> > [mailto:u-boot-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf 
> > Of Matthew S. McClintock
> > Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 1:30 PM
> > To: u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: [U-Boot-Users] omap5910
> > 
> > 
> > Has anyone done any work for the omap5910 cpu for u-boot? I 
> > understand its extremely similar to the omap1510 cpu. Does 
> > anyone have any code or pointers to how the two cpu's are different?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Matthew
> > 
> > -- 
> > Matthew S. McClintock <mattsm@arlut.utexas.edu>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. 
> > Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
> > help you create better code?   SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
> > YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> > _______________________________________________
> > U-Boot-Users mailing list
> > U-Boot-Users at lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
> > 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
> Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
> help you create better code?   SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
> YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot-Users mailing list
> U-Boot-Users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
-- 
Matthew S. McClintock <mattsm@arlut.utexas.edu>

[U-Boot-Users] omap5910

[Woodruff, Richard]

I corresponded with a couple people who use bdi2000 on omap.  If you read
around on some news archives you will find them.  George Davis is one who
comes to mind.

Regards,

Richard W.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew S. McClintock [mailto:mattsm at arlut.utexas.edu] 
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 2:37 PM
> To: Woodruff, Richard
> Cc: u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [U-Boot-Users] omap5910
> 
> 
> Currently we are using the JTAG interface on our development 
> board with Code Composer on Windows. I would like to switch 
> to the BDI2000 I am used to debugging from with GNU tools on 
> Linux. Based on information from Albatron's web page there is 
> support for the ARM9TDMI cpu on the BDI2000, I am curious if 
> anyone has a bdi2000 config for this cpu?
> 
> Thanks,
> Matthew
> 
> On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 13:55, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
> > The 5910 for all practically purposes is the 1510.  I have 
> seen a doc 
> > somewhere, not sure if I captured it or not.
> > 
> > Basically, the difference is the way the parts are tested 
> and sorted.  
> > The 1510 parts are speed rated, and you can get up to a 
> 168MHx part.  
> > The 5910 parts are not and its only guaranteed up to 
> 150MHz, but its 
> > likely many will run at 168.  The 1510 also "claims" 
> support for some 
> > functionality which the 5910 will not admit to having.  The issue 
> > there is support and validation. 5910 parts will not be 
> validated for 
> > everything a 1510 will be.
> > 
> > I use a mix of both types of chips on development boards.  
> I use their 
> > u-boot images interchangeably....I have set my timings back 
> to 150MHz 
> > as the thing I've been working on will get parts stamped as 
> 5910 not 
> > 1510.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Richard W.
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: u-boot-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net
> > > [mailto:u-boot-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf 
> > > Of Matthew S. McClintock
> > > Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 1:30 PM
> > > To: u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> > > Subject: [U-Boot-Users] omap5910
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Has anyone done any work for the omap5910 cpu for u-boot? I
> > > understand its extremely similar to the omap1510 cpu. Does 
> > > anyone have any code or pointers to how the two cpu's are 
> different?
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Matthew
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Matthew S. McClintock <mattsm@arlut.utexas.edu>
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
> > > Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
> > > help you create better code?   SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
> > > YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > U-Boot-Users mailing list
> > > U-Boot-Users at lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does 
> > SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
> > help you create better code?   SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
> > YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ 
> > _______________________________________________
> > U-Boot-Users mailing list
> > U-Boot-Users at lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
> -- 
> Matthew S. McClintock <mattsm@arlut.utexas.edu>
> 
> 

[U-Boot-Users] omap5910

[George G. Davis]

Matthew,

I'll send you the BDI config files off list.

If anyone else would like a copy, just let me know.

--
Regards,
George

Woodruff, Richard wrote:
> I corresponded with a couple people who use bdi2000 on omap.  If you read
> around on some news archives you will find them.  George Davis is one who
> comes to mind.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Richard W.
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Matthew S. McClintock [mailto:mattsm at arlut.utexas.edu] 
>>Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 2:37 PM
>>To: Woodruff, Richard
>>Cc: u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>>Subject: RE: [U-Boot-Users] omap5910
>>
>>
>>Currently we are using the JTAG interface on our development 
>>board with Code Composer on Windows. I would like to switch 
>>to the BDI2000 I am used to debugging from with GNU tools on 
>>Linux. Based on information from Albatron's web page there is 
>>support for the ARM9TDMI cpu on the BDI2000, I am curious if 
>>anyone has a bdi2000 config for this cpu?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Matthew
>>
>>On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 13:55, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
>>
>>>The 5910 for all practically purposes is the 1510.  I have 
>>
>>seen a doc 
>>
>>>somewhere, not sure if I captured it or not.
>>>
>>>Basically, the difference is the way the parts are tested 
>>
>>and sorted.  
>>
>>>The 1510 parts are speed rated, and you can get up to a 
>>
>>168MHx part.  
>>
>>>The 5910 parts are not and its only guaranteed up to 
>>
>>150MHz, but its 
>>
>>>likely many will run at 168.  The 1510 also "claims" 
>>
>>support for some 
>>
>>>functionality which the 5910 will not admit to having.  The issue 
>>>there is support and validation. 5910 parts will not be 
>>
>>validated for 
>>
>>>everything a 1510 will be.
>>>
>>>I use a mix of both types of chips on development boards.  
>>
>>I use their 
>>
>>>u-boot images interchangeably....I have set my timings back 
>>
>>to 150MHz 
>>
>>>as the thing I've been working on will get parts stamped as 
>>
>>5910 not 
>>
>>>1510.
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>
>>>Richard W.
>>>
>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: u-boot-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>[mailto:u-boot-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf 
>>>>Of Matthew S. McClintock
>>>>Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 1:30 PM
>>>>To: u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>Subject: [U-Boot-Users] omap5910
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Has anyone done any work for the omap5910 cpu for u-boot? I
>>>>understand its extremely similar to the omap1510 cpu. Does 
>>>>anyone have any code or pointers to how the two cpu's are 
>>
>>different?
>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>Matthew
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>Matthew S. McClintock <mattsm@arlut.utexas.edu>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>>>This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
>>>>Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
>>>>help you create better code?   SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
>>>>YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>U-Boot-Users mailing list
>>>>U-Boot-Users at lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>>This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does 
>>>SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
>>>help you create better code?   SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
>>>YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ 
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>U-Boot-Users mailing list
>>>U-Boot-Users at lists.sourceforge.net
>>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
>>
>>-- 
>>Matthew S. McClintock <mattsm@arlut.utexas.edu>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
> Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
> help you create better code?   SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
> YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot-Users mailing list
> U-Boot-Users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
> 

[U-Boot-Users] omap5910

[Wolfgang Denk]

In message <1067546224.26405.29.camel@chuck.arlut.utexas.edu> you wrote:
> Currently we are using the JTAG interface on our development board with
> Code Composer on Windows. I would like to switch to the BDI2000 I am
> used to debugging from with GNU tools on Linux. Based on information
> from Albatron's web page there is support for the ARM9TDMI cpu on the
> BDI2000, I am curious if anyone has a bdi2000 config for this cpu?

You get example config files with the software from Abatron.

Also, our collection of BDI2000 config files contains  some  ARM9TDMI
examples; see for example
ftp://ftp.denx.de/pub/BDI2000/smdk2400.cfg
ftp://ftp.denx.de/pub/BDI2000/trab.cfg

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87  Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88  Email: wd at denx.de
The sooner our happiness together begins, the longer it will last.
	-- Miramanee, "The Paradise Syndrome", stardate 4842.6

[U-Boot-Users] omap5910

[George G. Davis]

Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <1067546224.26405.29.camel@chuck.arlut.utexas.edu> you wrote:
> 
>>Currently we are using the JTAG interface on our development board with
>>Code Composer on Windows. I would like to switch to the BDI2000 I am
>>used to debugging from with GNU tools on Linux. Based on information
>>from Albatron's web page there is support for the ARM9TDMI cpu on the
>>BDI2000, I am curious if anyone has a bdi2000 config for this cpu?
> 
> 
> You get example config files with the software from Abatron.

True, in fact, it appears that inno925.cfg and reg925t.def are included in
recent armGDB versions.

--
Regards,
George

> 
> Also, our collection of BDI2000 config files contains  some  ARM9TDMI
> examples; see for example
> ftp://ftp.denx.de/pub/BDI2000/smdk2400.cfg
> ftp://ftp.denx.de/pub/BDI2000/trab.cfg
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Wolfgang Denk
>