From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wolfgang.grandegger@bluewin.ch>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Re:ELDK + MPC5200
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 09:30:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FBD53480004ECDB@mssbzhh-int.msg.bluewin.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3FCB437C.22603.BC82CE@localhost>
Hello,
the 2.4.4 kernel is rather old tree and it does not include
support for MPC5200. Check http://www.denx.de on how to
get an appropriate kernel tree. Therein you will also find
icecube_5200_defconfig. The problems you reported are very
likely due to invalid kernel configuration.
Hope it helps.
Wolfgang.
>-- Original Message --
>From: "Victor Wren" <vwren@timension.com>
>To: u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Re:ELDK + MPC5200
>Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 13:34:52 -0800
>
>
>Sorry if this is a dumb newbie question. I'm trying to compile the 2.4.4
>
>kernel that came with ELDK under RH9 using "ppc_82xx-make uImage". It gets
>
>up to drivers/char/flash.c and dies at the "bd_t bd* =(bd_t *)__res"
>declaration, with an "bd_t undeclared" error.
>
>I went looking for where bd_t is declared, and while some of the header
files
>
>do declare bd_t, it doesn't seem to be any of the ones in linux/ or asm/
>that
>are included by flash.c (or chained by header files that are included).
>
>My u-boot files are not in the same directory tree as ELDK. Could that
cause
>
>a problem? ELDK directories are in my path, and
>$CROSS_COMPILE=ppc_82xx-
>
>I notice there doesn't seem to be a default config in the linux tree for
>the
>IceCube. Are there any special linux config options to be aware of?
>
>Thanks,
>Victor Wren
>
>
>Victor Wren
>Designer,
>Timension Inc.
>1350 C Pear Ave
>Mountain View CA 94043
>(650) 564-9397
>Fax: (650) 564-9398
>Opinions stated in this letter are not necessarily
>those of Timension Inc. or the management. All
>Rights Reserved. No spitting.
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
>Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
>help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
>YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
>_______________________________________________
>U-Boot-Users mailing list
>U-Boot-Users at lists.sourceforge.net
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-02 8:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-01 19:24 [U-Boot-Users] RE: [PATCH] probe for smc91111.c before chip init Woodruff, Richard
2003-12-01 21:34 ` [U-Boot-Users] Re:ELDK + MPC5200 Victor Wren
2003-12-02 8:30 ` Wolfgang Grandegger [this message]
2003-12-07 19:41 ` [U-Boot-Users] RE: [PATCH] probe for smc91111.c before chip init Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FBD53480004ECDB@mssbzhh-int.msg.bluewin.ch \
--to=wolfgang.grandegger@bluewin.ch \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox