From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 20:10:46 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 10/10] setexpr: Add support for strings
In-Reply-To: <CAPnjgZ3DmeaincEcYkjeTuRijqtMZhJiDnyx_o4eSRE4gJaVFw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20201101211544.3579850-1-sjg@chromium.org>
 <20201101211544.3579850-11-sjg@chromium.org> <20201102000824.10fb538c@nic.cz>
 <CAPnjgZ3SXdKaKmYCw=Q0w-JGhghAPVhwHdtG5q2dNEMNiY60Xg@mail.gmail.com>
 <394232.1604594845@gemini.denx.de>
 <CAPnjgZ3DmeaincEcYkjeTuRijqtMZhJiDnyx_o4eSRE4gJaVFw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <402406.1604603446@gemini.denx.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Dear Simon.

In message <CAPnjgZ3DmeaincEcYkjeTuRijqtMZhJiDnyx_o4eSRE4gJaVFw@mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> > > setexpr c *10 + *100
> >
> > I don't get it.  The equivalent to "${a}${b}" would be
> >
> >         setexpr c "*10*100"
> >
> > which is even simpler?
>
> I don't see how that works. The *10 thing in my example reads a string
> out of address 10.

Ah, got it.  This requires your "[PATCH 10/10] setexpr: Add support
for strings" first...

But then... should there not be some '.s' size specification
somewhere?

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
"Unix is simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity."
					             - Dennis Ritchie