From: himbA <goavr@email.si>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] kernel bootparams
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:47:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <402B67C1.7060403@email.si> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040211232757.704EAC108D@atlas.denx.de>
i apoligize since i sent first reply to Wolfgang Denk only, my mail
client tricked me :)
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <402AB73F.5010803@email.si> you wrote:
>
>>I have a board, pxa based, and it has u-boot burnt, but i don't have the
>>source from which it was compiled from, so i don't have any config
>>setting (got the board as-is).
>
>
> Then request the source from the guys who gave/sold you the board.
> U-Boot is under GPL and they MUST give you the full source code,
> including all modifications they might have made, _ffor_free_.
>
got it today, the forgot to include on the cd they gave me.
>
>>for now booting is made from flash, loading both kernel and ramdisk. i
>>want to try nfs based booting and first strange thing i notice when
>>kernel gets booted is that kernel parameters are always the same, no
>>matter to what i set 'bootargs' var in u-boot. it always displays
>
>
> Probably the kernel uses it's own bootstrap loader which includes a
> hard-wired command line.
and how could i tell if such bootstrap loader exists ? as far as i know
there is nothing present on flash except u-boot and u-boot env.
>
>
>>I also tried changing CONFIG_CMDLINE setting in .config of the kernel to
>>same value as bootargs but still notihng changed.
>>
>>If CONFIG_BOOTARGS var in u-boot is specified during compile time, does
>>it interfere with bootargs passed at boot time ?
>
>
> No, this is just the default value which can be overwritten by the
> standard setenv command.
>
ok, that means kernel line supplied to the kernel is hardwired, i guess,
somewhere else.
>
>>i will copile u-boot from CVS tomorrow (need to create new board
>>defines), just need to clear some stuff now...
>
>
> Complain at the guys who gave you the board!!
>
i did, and i got it - but they have 1.0.0 sources ported and said they
tried porting cvs version, but had some problems.
are there major changes from 1.0.0 and current cvs (1.0.2)? it is only a
patch revision according to numbering in README as I recall, so how
different could it be.
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
>
thank, you
regards, himba
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-12 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-11 23:14 [U-Boot-Users] kernel bootparams himbA
2004-02-11 23:27 ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-02-12 11:47 ` himbA [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=402B67C1.7060403@email.si \
--to=goavr@email.si \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox