From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: himbA <goavr@email.si>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:47:13 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] kernel bootparams
In-Reply-To: <20040211232757.704EAC108D@atlas.denx.de>
References: <20040211232757.704EAC108D@atlas.denx.de>
Message-ID: <402B67C1.7060403@email.si>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

i apoligize since i sent first reply to Wolfgang Denk only, my mail 
client tricked me :)

Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <402AB73F.5010803@email.si> you wrote:
> 
>>I have a board, pxa based, and it has u-boot burnt, but i don't have the 
>>source from which it was compiled from, so i don't have any config 
>>setting (got the board as-is).
> 
> 
> Then request the source from the guys who gave/sold  you  the  board.
> U-Boot  is  under  GPL  and  they MUST give you the full source code,
> including all modifications they might have made, _ffor_free_.
> 
got it today, the forgot to include on the cd they gave me.
> 
>>for now booting is made from flash, loading both kernel and ramdisk. i 
>>want to try nfs based booting and first strange thing i notice when 
>>kernel gets booted is that kernel parameters are always the same, no 
>>matter to what i set 'bootargs' var in u-boot. it always displays
> 
> 
> Probably the kernel uses it's own bootstrap loader which  includes  a
> hard-wired command line.
and how could i tell if such bootstrap loader exists ? as far as i know
there is nothing present on flash except u-boot and u-boot env.
> 
> 
>>I also tried changing CONFIG_CMDLINE setting in .config of the kernel to 
>>same value as bootargs but still notihng changed.
>>
>>If CONFIG_BOOTARGS var in u-boot is specified during compile time, does 
>>it interfere with bootargs passed at boot time ?
> 
> 
> No, this is just the default value which can be  overwritten  by  the
> standard setenv command.
> 
ok, that means kernel line supplied to the kernel is hardwired, i guess,
somewhere else.
> 
>>i will copile u-boot from CVS tomorrow (need to create new board 
>>defines), just need to clear some stuff now...
> 
> 
> Complain at the guys who gave you the board!!
>
i did, and i got it - but they have 1.0.0 sources ported and said they
tried porting cvs version, but had some problems.
are there major changes from 1.0.0 and current cvs (1.0.2)? it is only a
patch revision according to numbering in README as I recall, so how
different could it be.

> Best regards,
> 
> Wolfgang Denk
> 

thank, you

regards, himba