* [U-Boot-Users] Can we limit number of messages per day.
[not found] <20040224170459.19AFC22DB@gabriel.aristoslogic.com>
@ 2004-02-24 17:22 ` Abbas Dadabhoy
2004-02-24 23:36 ` Wolfgang Denk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Abbas Dadabhoy @ 2004-02-24 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Wont it be nice to limit these number of messages to 1 or 2 a day.
u-boot-users-request at lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Send U-Boot-Users mailing list submissions to
> u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> u-boot-users-request at lists.sourceforge.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> u-boot-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of U-Boot-Users digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. RE: Problems with u-boot, PPChameleonEVB and MontaVista kernel (Andy Hawkins)
> 2. Re: Where can I find a libgcc.a with software FP. (Wolfgang Denk)
> 3. Re: telnet server on u-boot (Detlev Zundel)
> 4. Re: Compile Error (Wolfgang Denk)
> 5. Re: NFS support patch (Detlev Zundel)
> 6. RE: Problems with u-boot, PPChameleonEVB and MontaVista kernel (Andy Hawkins)
> 7. Re: NFS support patch (Steven Scholz)
> 8. Memory Access Problem (sudhakar rajashekhara)
> 9. Re: telnet server on u-boot (Wolfgang Denk)
> 10. Re: NFS support patch (Steven Scholz)
> 11. Re: telnet server on u-boot (Laurent Mohin)
> 12. Re: Where can I find a libgcc.a with software FP. (Marius Groeger)
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 1
> From: "Andy Hawkins" <a.hawkins@cabletime.com>
> To: <u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: RE: [U-Boot-Users] Problems with u-boot, PPChameleonEVB and MontaVista kernel
> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 15:45:44 -0000
>
> > Is there any special reason to use their kernel? What does it
> contain
> > that you cannot find in DAVE's / our tested and working kernel tree?
>
> Well, we've decided to use the MontaVista distribution / development
> environment, and that integrates nicely with their kernel build tools.
> There may well be features that are present in the MontaVista kernel
> tree that we would like to use too (although I'd have to check the
> details). I think the general feeling is that having one source for
> all this is the best way to go (if we can get it to work).
>
> > You have to accept the fact that "similar" is not good enough.
> You
> > must use a kernel which has been proted to the _exact_
> matching
> > board, or you will run into problems sooner or later - at least
> if
> > you don't understand EXACTLY what you are doing (which seems not
> to
> > be the case - no offence meant).
>
> You're absolutely right, I don't understand exactly what I'm doing :).
> No offence taken whatsoever. I've read through most of 'Understanding
> the Linux Kernel', but unfortunately it only covers the early kernel
> boot process for the i386 architecture. Is there any other reference
> that can give more information for the PowerPC?
>
> > Of course. You shall break compatibility to the rest of the
> world
> > just to make their kernel work. What a nonsense.
> >
> > > I do have access to a BDI2000, that I've used to break into
> > a running
> > > kernel (at start_here), but can't get it to break when I use the
> > > MontaVista kernel. From this, I assume that it's failing somewhere
> > > very early in the linux boot process.
> > >
> > > Can anyone offer any advice?
> >
> > Your question is a FAQ:
> >
> http://www.denx.de/twiki/bin/view/DULG/LinuxHangsAfterUncompressingKer
> nel
>
> I've followed the information in that FAQ. However, all it tells me to
> do is match up the bd_info structures, and check clock information.
>
> > What I cannot understand is why you are wasting your time (and
> ours) if you
> > have a working kernel which you can use.
>
> It just seems to make sense to try to keep everything (kernel, apps,
> development etc.) under 'one roof' (i.e. MontaVista) if at all
> possible.
>
> I think whichever kernel tree we use, we're going to have to do some
> porting either way, so I'd appreciate some guidance as to where in the
> kernel I should be looking to resolve the problems we currently have
> (as I might need the knowledge gained when we come to adding further
> customisations later).
>
> We *do* have a BDI 2000, but I think my ability to be able to debug
> this problem is hindered by my limited knowledge of the kernel startup
> code.
>
> Any pointers on how to improve that knowledge (URLs, book and the
> like), with specific reference to the PowerPC processor, would be much
> appreciated.
>
> Thanks to all who have replied thus far.
>
> Andy
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 2
> To: u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Bernieshu <bernie.shu@smartbridges.com>
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] Where can I find a libgcc.a with software FP.
> From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:58:14 +0100
>
> In message <Pine.LNX.4.56.0402241626510.21705@mag.sysgo.com> Marius Groeger wrote:
> >
> > This is a problem with the gcc/binutils toochain, which doesn't handle
> > -msoft-float the way we want it. The error you're seeing isn't really
> > one, since neither the U-Boot code nor the quoted functions in
> > libgcc.a actually use FP instructions. It's only the ELF binary tags
> > that don't match.
>
> I'm not sure. I don't know for certain for ARM, but on other archi-
> tectures GCC will happily generate FP instructions for example to
> perform fast memory copy operations (like when assigning structures
> of the "right" size).
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
>
> --
> Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
> Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd at denx.de
> In 1750 Issac Newton became discouraged when he fell up a flight of
> stairs.
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 3
> To: "Laurent Mohin" <laurent.mohin@acterna.com>
> Cc: u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] telnet server on u-boot
> From: Detlev Zundel <dzu@denx.de>
> Date: 24 Feb 2004 17:05:32 +0100
>
> Hello Laurent,
>
> > For some remote instruments, I need to be able to have a telnet access to
> > the boot in case of my Linux kernel and file system are down (after an
> > upgrade for example).
> > I don't think that u-boot provide telnet support and I had a look at
> > another boot project called redboot that provide such a functionality.
> > I have a couple of questions :
> > Does anybody see another solution than telnet to control a remote
> > instrument?
> > Has anybody already tried to add telnet server to u-boot? It seems to be a
> > challenging task because we need to add TCP support.
>
> U-Boot does not contain any TCP implementation. I doubt that this
> will be doable with reasonable effort. Writing a standard conform
> TCP implementation is a daunting task that even many proprietary
> systems could not solve, i.e. there are many TCP implementations
> working well in "the lab" _only_.
>
> What I had in mind is a "UDP console" as it was implemented some time
> ago for the Linux kernel also (there was a patch floating around).
> Googling for it I found at least this link [1]. This would of course
> need a "special" program to access the console but it is a much more
> realistic target to aim at.
>
> > Has anybody used both u-boot and redboot and can point me the main
> > advantages and drawbacks of both?
>
> Sorry, I can't help you there.
>
> Cheers
> Detlev
>
> [1] http://www.linux.it/kerneldocs/sercons/sercons.html
>
> --
> Directories are added, deleted, and rearranged much as you would
> expect, even if you don't know it's what you'd expect.
> -- Tom Lord in TLA Documentation
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 4
> To: Jim Xu <Jim.Xu@flextronics.com>
> Cc: "'u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net'" <u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] Compile Error
> From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:11:30 +0100
>
> Dear Jim,
>
> in message <75490FAA49820647AB2BAFEFE08BFABC0CD98D@dalnt225.dal.flextronics.com> you wrote:
> >
> > I downloaded and installed the ELDK. My board is Motorola FADS860T. I did:
> ...
> > {standard input}:19: Error: Relocation cannot be done when using
> > -mrelocatable
>
> Seems you are using the new (3.0) ELDK which is based on GCC-3.x with
> an old version of U-boot.
>
> > Do I miss something in the build process?
>
> Your U-Boot sources are too old for this compiler. GCC-3.x requires a
> few adaptions which were added in later versions of U-Boot. See for
> example the source tree (1.0.2) which is included with the ELDK.
>
> > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C3FAEC.4DA52400
> > Content-Type: text/html;
> > charset="iso-8859-1"
> >
> > <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
> > <HTML><HEAD>
>
> And PLEASE do NOT post HTML!!
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
>
> --
> Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
> Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd at denx.de
> The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new
> discoveries, is not "Eureka!" (I found it!) but "That's funny ..."
> -- Isaac Asimov
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 5
> To: Masami Komiya <mkomiya@sonare.it>
> Cc: Steven Scholz <steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de>, Wolfgang Denk
> <wd@denx.de>,
> U-BOOT-USERS <u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] NFS support patch
> From: Detlev Zundel <dzu@denx.de>
> Date: 24 Feb 2004 17:13:17 +0100
>
> Hi Masami & Steven,
>
> > I have no objection.
> >
> > Masami Komiya
> >
> > Steven Scholz wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > >>> I uploaded NFS support patch to my web site.
> > >>>
> > >>> http://www.sonare.it/u-boot/u-boot-nfs.patch.gz
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Well done, thanks a lot!
> > >>
> > >> Checked in.
> > > I think CFG_CMD_NFS should be considered "non-standard". It does not
> > > even compile for AT91RM9200.
>
> As long as the NFS support does not compile on all platforms it should
> probably be non-standard - _iff_ it compiles on all platforms I would
> certainly reconsider this as the code impact is minimal but the
> feature will be very helpful (IMHO).
>
> But until then, Steven can you share the compile problems with us so
> we can fix them? There should really be no general reason why this
> should not work on ARM, or am I missing something?
>
> Thanks!
> Detlev
>
> --
> Directories are added, deleted, and rearranged much as you would
> expect, even if you don't know it's what you'd expect.
> -- Tom Lord in TLA Documentation
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 6
> From: "Andy Hawkins" <a.hawkins@cabletime.com>
> To: <u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: RE: [U-Boot-Users] Problems with u-boot, PPChameleonEVB and MontaVista kernel
> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:16:09 -0000
>
> > Then you will either have to move all the modifications needed
> for
> > the PPCHameleon board into their kernel tree (thus creating
> something
> > which again is not the original MV kernel), or have MV provide
> a
> > kernel extended in such way.
>
> That's what I'm expecting to have to do, but unfortunately know where
> to look for the changes I need to make is difficult.
>
> > Yes, and this is your most pressing problem. When the
> parameters
> > passed to the Linux kernel are correct you will at least get
> some
> > boot messages, and see where the kernel crashes then (which it
> will
> > do).
>
> Well, I think I *have* matched up the two structures, but we're still
> not seeing anything. Where can I put breakpoints in the kernel to try
> to work out why we're not getting any boot messages?
>
> > I think you can use another kernel tree (like that from our
> CVS
> > server) without problems. If you feel you must move our patches
> into
> > the MV tree please feel free to do so - all the history and
> comments
> > are available for free on our CVS server. You can extract the
> patches
> > that are relevant for the PPChameleon board and try applying them
> to
> > the MV tree - I don't expect any serious problems there.
>
> At the risk of asking newbie questions, how would I go about doing
> this?
>
> Thanks again for all the help so far, it's much appreciated.
>
> Andy
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:17:27 +0100
> From: Steven Scholz <steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de>
> CC: U-BOOT-USERS <u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] NFS support patch
>
> Hi Detlev,
>
> >>>I think CFG_CMD_NFS should be considered "non-standard". It does not
> >>>even compile for AT91RM9200.
> >=20
> > As long as the NFS support does not compile on all platforms it should
> > probably be non-standard - _iff_ it compiles on all platforms I would
> > certainly reconsider this as the code impact is minimal but the
> > feature will be very helpful (IMHO).
> >=20
> > But until then, Steven can you share the compile problems with us so
> > we can fix them? There should really be no general reason why this
> > should not work on ARM, or am I missing something?
>
> No big deal.
> There's no get_ticks() yet for AT91RM9200. I fixed that and I am about=20
> to test it and to provide a patch real soon now.
>
> --=20
> Steven Scholz
>
> imc Measurement & Control imc Me=DFsysteme GmbH
> Voltastr. 5 Voltastr. 5
> 13355 Berlin 13355 Berlin
> Germany Deutschland
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 08:26:52 -0800 (PST)
> From: sudhakar rajashekhara <rsudhakar_blr@yahoo.com>
> To: u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Memory Access Problem
>
> Hi,
>
> We have ported U-boot and Linux to a custom 8280
> board. For this board, the LED base has been set at
> 0x2200A000. I am able to write to this base from
> U-boot using mw command and control the LED display.
> But if I try to access the same memory from Linux, the
> kernel is raising an exception. I even tried to map
> this memory area by calling ioremap in MMU_init but
> the result was same. Do I have to do any other
> configuration in the Linx kernel to access this memory
> area? Following is the log:
>
> regards,
> Sudhakar.
>
> =======================================================
> Oops: kernel access of bad area, sig: 11
>
> NIP: C0139034 XER: 00000000 LR: C0139024 SP: C05B9F90
> REGS: c05b9ee0 TRAP: 0300
> Not tainted
>
> MSR: 00009032 EE: 1 PR: 0 FP: 0 ME: 1 IR/DR: 11
>
> DAR: 2200A000, DSISR: 22000000
>
> TASK = c05b8000[1] 'swapper' Last syscall: -1
>
> last math 00000000 last altivec 00000000
>
> GPR00: FFFFFFFF C05B9F90 C05B8000 C0110000 00001032
> 00000001 00000001 00000000
>
> GPR08: F0000088 2200A000 C012D417 C05B9EA0 C0170000
> 00000000 10000000 00000000
> GPR24: 00000000 00000000 40000000 007FFF7E 007FFF00
> 00000000 C0170000 007FFEB0
> Call backtrace:
> =======================================================
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want.
> http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 9
> To: u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] telnet server on u-boot
> From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:26:35 +0100
>
> In message <87fzd04g4z.fsf@deepthought.outer.space.org> Detlev Zundel wrote:
> >
> > > For some remote instruments, I need to be able to have a telnet access to
> > > the boot in case of my Linux kernel and file system are down (after an
> > > upgrade for example).
> > > I don't think that u-boot provide telnet support and I had a look at
> > > another boot project called redboot that provide such a functionality.
> > > I have a couple of questions :
> > > Does anybody see another solution than telnet to control a remote
> > > instrument?
>
> There are many solutions. You don't provide much informatiuon about
> your workign environment so it is difficult to make a good recommen-
> dation. Standard solutions include: use a modem to attach to the
> serial console; use a terminal server to attach to the serial
> console; etc.
>
> > What I had in mind is a "UDP console" as it was implemented some time
> > ago for the Linux kernel also (there was a patch floating around).
> > Googling for it I found at least this link [1]. This would of course
> > need a "special" program to access the console but it is a much more
> > realistic target to aim at.
>
> This has been discussed before indeed for U-Boot, too. Interest for
> such a feature seems to pretty limited, though.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
>
> --
> Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
> Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd at denx.de
> An expert is a person who avoids the small errors while sweeping on
> to the grand fallacy.
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:37:09 +0100
> From: Steven Scholz <steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de>
> To: Masami Komiya <mkomiya@sonare.it>
> CC: U-BOOT-USERS <u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] NFS support patch
>
> Masami Komiya wrote:
>
> > I uploaded NFS support patch to my web site.
> >
> > http://www.sonare.it/u-boot/u-boot-nfs.patch.gz
> >
> > If you are interested in, please evaluate.
> >
> > The most part of this is taken from etherboot.
> >
> > To use NFS support, add the definition CFG_CMD_NFS
> > to CONFIG_COMMANDS defined in the configration file
> > of your board.
>
> I tried it but it does not work on my ARM (AT91RM9200) board:
>
> multiIO> nfs 0x20500000 10.0.2.9:/opt/eldk/arm_920TDI/uImage
> File transfer via NFS from server 10.0.2.9; our IP address is 10.0.9.155
> Filename '/opt/eldk/arm_920TDI/uImage'.
> Load address: 0x20500000
> Loading: #################################################################
> #############################################
> done
> Bytes transferred = 560892 (88efc hex)
>
> Fair enough so far. The length is correct. But apparently I did not
> get the correct data:
>
> multiIO> md.w 0x20500000
> 20500000: 0500 4c89 3b40 5f7c 0000 0000 3b40 b77a ...L@;|_....@;z.
> 20500010: 0000 0000 3b40 b77a 0000 0000 ffff ffff ....@;z.........
> 20500020: ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ................
> 20500030: ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ................
> 20500040: ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ................
> 20500050: ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ................
> 20500060: ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ................
> 20500070: ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ................
>
> But it should look like this:
>
> scholz at Pinguin:/opt/eldk/arm_920TDI> hexdump uImage | head
> 0000000 0527 5619 1fb4 eeca 1640 146c 0800 bc8e
> 0000010 0020 0080 0020 0080 455f 8430 0205 0102
> 0000020 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000
> *
> 0000040 8b1f 0808 6c13 4016 0302 696c 756e 2e78
> 0000050 6962 006e bdec 7c0d 555c 3f99 ee7e a4bc
> 0000060 6493 dc9a 1264 6d08 b7a0 806d 0180 da6e
> 0000070 a100 74a6 8b4a 5b54 da65 a806 3558 d140
>
> What's the problem?
>
> --
> Steven Scholz
>
> imc Measurement & Control imc Me?systeme GmbH
> Voltastr. 5 Voltastr. 5
> 13355 Berlin 13355 Berlin
> Germany Deutschland
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 11
> To: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
> Cc: u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] telnet server on u-boot
> From: "Laurent Mohin" <laurent.mohin@acterna.com>
> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:41:58 +0100
>
> Wolfgang,
>
> In message above, you wrote :
>
> > > For some remote instruments, I need to be able to have a telnet access
> to
> > > the boot in case of my Linux kernel and file system are down (after an
>
> > > upgrade for example).
> > > I don't think that u-boot provide telnet support and I had a look at
> > > another boot project called redboot that provide such a functionality.
> > > I have a couple of questions :
> > > Does anybody see another solution than telnet to control a remote
> > > instrument?
>
> > There are many solutions. You don't provide much informatiuon about
> > your workign environment so it is difficult to make a good recommen-
> > dation. Standard solutions include: use a modem to attach to the
> > serial console; use a terminal server to attach to the serial
> > console; etc.
>
> Use of a modem or a terminal server to attach to the serial console is not
> a good solution for me, because I hope to deploy at least several hundred
> of instruments. And the only link I have with them is thru Ethernet.
> That's why I'm looking for something similar as telnet.
>
> Thanks for your reply,
>
> Laurent
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:53:39 +0100 (CET)
> From: Marius Groeger <mgroeger@sysgo.com>
> To: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
> cc: u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net,
> Bernieshu <bernie.shu@smartbridges.com>
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] Where can I find a libgcc.a with software FP.
>
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>
> > In message <Pine.LNX.4.56.0402241626510.21705@mag.sysgo.com> Marius Groeger wrote:
> > >
> > > This is a problem with the gcc/binutils toochain, which doesn't handle
> > > -msoft-float the way we want it. The error you're seeing isn't really
> > > one, since neither the U-Boot code nor the quoted functions in
> > > libgcc.a actually use FP instructions. It's only the ELF binary tags
> > > that don't match.
> >
> > I'm not sure. I don't know for certain for ARM, but on other archi-
> > tectures GCC will happily generate FP instructions for example to
> > perform fast memory copy operations (like when assigning structures
> > of the "right" size).
>
> I'm having similar doubts, as I wrote in my previous post. Please read
> it again (to the end.)
>
> In practice, however, I have not seen this kind of optimising as of
> yet. Maybe on ARM there is no gain in performance. Unless there is a
> proper (read: for all ARM architectures, and working like we know it
> from powerpc-linux) -msoft-float patch for GCC 3, I'm inclined to just
> (carefully) drop -msoft-float from *boot.
>
> I'm curious about Robert Schwebel's assessment of this issue, since I
> know he's been workin on this.
>
> Regards,
> Marius
>
> --
> Marius Groeger <mgroeger@sysgo.com>
> Project Manager
>
> SYSGO Real-Time Solutions AG | Embedded and Real-Time Software
> Am Pfaffenstein 14
> 55270 Klein-Winternheim, Germany
>
> Voice: +49-6136-9948-0 | FAX: +49-6136-9948-10
> www.sysgo.com | www.elinos.com | www.osek.de
>
> --__--__--
>
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot-Users mailing list
> U-Boot-Users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
>
> End of U-Boot-Users Digest
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread