* [U-Boot-Users] get_ticks() for AT91RM9200
@ 2004-02-27 14:48 Steven Scholz
2004-02-28 4:24 ` Masami Komiya
2004-03-15 8:06 ` Steven Scholz
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Steven Scholz @ 2004-02-27 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi there,
as mentioned before the AT91RM9200 port was missing a get_ticks()
function. I made a lot of white space fixes as well because now the
similarities _and_ differences with other ARM implementations are more
obvious when doing a "diff".
I added get_ticks() because it was needed by the NFS implementation.
However it looks like get_ticks() is hardly use in U-Boot. I think
get_timer() is used in most cases...
CHANGELOG:
* Patch by Steven Scholz, 27 Feb 2004:
- Adding get_ticks() and get_tbclk() for AT91RM9200
- Many white space fixes in cpu/at91rm9200/interrupts.c
Thanks,
--
Steven Scholz
imc Measurement & Control imc Me?systeme GmbH
Voltastr. 5 Voltastr. 5
13355 Berlin 13355 Berlin
Germany Deutschland
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: at91_timer.patch.gz
Type: application/x-gzip
Size: 2315 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20040227/bfb99279/attachment.bin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] get_ticks() for AT91RM9200
2004-02-27 14:48 [U-Boot-Users] get_ticks() for AT91RM9200 Steven Scholz
@ 2004-02-28 4:24 ` Masami Komiya
2004-03-15 8:06 ` Steven Scholz
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Masami Komiya @ 2004-02-28 4:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Steven Scholz wrote:
> I added get_ticks() because it was needed by the NFS implementation.
> However it looks like get_ticks() is hardly use in U-Boot. I think
> get_timer() is used in most cases...
I thought get_ticks() was already implemented in all CPU,
because it is used in common/main.c and I was only
interested in the implementation of MIPS CPU.
get_ticks() in NFS seems to be the obstruction for another.
Should I change to get_timer(0) ?
Masami Komiya
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] get_ticks() for AT91RM9200
2004-02-27 14:48 [U-Boot-Users] get_ticks() for AT91RM9200 Steven Scholz
2004-02-28 4:24 ` Masami Komiya
@ 2004-03-15 8:06 ` Steven Scholz
2004-03-15 9:08 ` Wolfgang Denk
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Steven Scholz @ 2004-03-15 8:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
I wrote:
> ...
> CHANGELOG:
>
> * Patch by Steven Scholz, 27 Feb 2004:
> - Adding get_ticks() and get_tbclk() for AT91RM9200
> - Many white space fixes in cpu/at91rm9200/interrupts.c
This one is not yet in the CVS.
Thanks,
Steven
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] get_ticks() for AT91RM9200
2004-03-15 8:06 ` Steven Scholz
@ 2004-03-15 9:08 ` Wolfgang Denk
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2004-03-15 9:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
In message <405563E9.8070709@imc-berlin.de> you wrote:
>
> > * Patch by Steven Scholz, 27 Feb 2004:
> > - Adding get_ticks() and get_tbclk() for AT91RM9200
> > - Many white space fixes in cpu/at91rm9200/interrupts.c
>
> This one is not yet in the CVS.
Thanks for the reminder, added.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd at denx.de
You can do this in a number of ways. IBM chose to do all of them.
Why do you find that funny? -- D. Taylor, Computer Science 350
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-03-15 9:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-02-27 14:48 [U-Boot-Users] get_ticks() for AT91RM9200 Steven Scholz
2004-02-28 4:24 ` Masami Komiya
2004-03-15 8:06 ` Steven Scholz
2004-03-15 9:08 ` Wolfgang Denk
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox