[U-Boot-Users] MPC885

[U-Boot-Users] MPC885

[Kerl, John]

Oops, I immediately apologize for having neglected to include the subject
line last time.  My bad!

-----Original Message-----
From: u-boot-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:u-boot-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net]
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 2:30 PM
To: u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] (no subject)


Is anyone starting work on 885 support?  We have an 885 board
coming up very soon, so I will be happy to help out.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id\x1470&alloc_id638&op=ick
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users

[U-Boot-Users] MPC885

[Pantelis Antoniou]

Kerl, John wrote:

>
>Is anyone starting work on 885 support?  We have an 885 board
>coming up very soon, so I will be happy to help out.
>
>

What do you mean starting ;) ?

My latest patch for our two new boards are based on
a 885/875. See boards/netphone, boards/netta.

Regards

Pantelis

[U-Boot-Users] 512-Bytes EEPROM

[Bruno]

Hello,

I'm porting U-Boot 1.1.0 to a board which has a
512-Bytes EEPROM. So, I set the define
CFG_I2C_EEPROM_ADDR_LEN to 2, to support the 16-bit
addresses. But the EEPROM doesn't worked fine, I can't
even read or write it. If I set this define to 1, the
EEPROM works properly (but only the first 256 bytes).

So, my question is: it's necessary set another
define/flag to user EEPROMs larger than 256 bytes?

Thanks in advance,

Bruno


______________________________________________________________________

Yahoo! Mail - O melhor e-mail do Brasil! Abra sua conta agora:
http://br.yahoo.com/info/mail.html

[U-Boot-Users] 512-Bytes EEPROM

[Wolfgang Denk]

In message <20040423135125.79058.qmail@web61309.mail.yahoo.com> you wrote:
> 
> I'm porting U-Boot 1.1.0 to a board which has a
> 512-Bytes EEPROM. So, I set the define
> CFG_I2C_EEPROM_ADDR_LEN to 2, to support the 16-bit
> addresses. But the EEPROM doesn't worked fine, I can't
> even read or write it. If I set this define to 1, the
> EEPROM works properly (but only the first 256 bytes).
> 
> So, my question is: it's necessary set another
> define/flag to user EEPROMs larger than 256 bytes?

Yes.

Ummm.. Did you have a look at the README?

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87  Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88  Email: wd at denx.de
I paid too much for it, but its worth it.