public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Peverley <dpeverley@mpc-data.co.uk>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] v1.1.0, omap boards and udelay()
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 12:59:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4083BF24.9030500@mpc-data.co.uk> (raw)

Hi all,

  I'm just merging my omap730p2 port into the 1.1.0 codebase, and have hit
a snag that I would have thought would affect the omap1510 and 1610 code as
well ; can anyone confirm this? The problem is as follows :
 
  in boards/omapXXXX/omapXXXX.c, the function ether__init() uses the 
udelay() call. Prior to version 1.1.0, this was implemented using :
  #if defined(CONFIG_INNOVATOROMAP1610) || defined(CONFIG_P2OMAP730)
  #define LOOPS_PER_MSEC 100		/* tuned on omap1610 */
      volatile int i, time_remaining = LOOPS_PER_MSEC * usec;
      for (i = time_remaining; i > 0; i--) {
  }
  #else
so that the omap's wouldn't use the MPU timer, as this does not work (at 
least at that point in the startup) This means that u-boot hangs on my 
board during ether__init() now as the timer never gets incremented. 

  Can anyone tell me why this code was removed? Looking at it, I can't see
a reason why it shouldn't break the 1510/1610 omap support as well. I've 
tested moving the code back as it was (using the 1.1.0 CONFIG_OMAP instead)
and this fixes the problem once more. 

Best Wishes,

Dave Peverley

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Dave Peverley, Software Engineer, MPC Data Limited.
Phone : [+44] (0) 1225 868 228              Web : http://www.mpc-data.co.uk

             reply	other threads:[~2004-04-19 11:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-04-19 11:59 Dave Peverley [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-04-20 16:30 [U-Boot-Users] v1.1.0, omap boards and udelay() Kamat, Nishant
2004-04-21  7:23 Gupta, Kshitij
2004-04-25 13:39 ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-04-26  9:31   ` Dave Peverley
2004-04-26 11:03     ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-04-26 11:15       ` Dave Peverley
2004-04-26 12:47         ` Wolfgang Denk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4083BF24.9030500@mpc-data.co.uk \
    --to=dpeverley@mpc-data.co.uk \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox