From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Scholz Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 08:10:14 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Motorola i.MX support (1/2) In-Reply-To: <20040618193020.GA5922@veltins.saufen> References: <20040618152118.GA27424@pengutronix.de> <20040618155918.02883C13D3@atlas.denx.de> <20040618193020.GA5922@veltins.saufen> Message-ID: <40D67BC6.8040409@imc-berlin.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Sascha Hauer wrote: > I've just had a look at the i.MX (MC9328 MX1, or however this thing is > called) Port in current CVS. The main differences are: > > - Like Robert said, my patch introduces less duplication of code > - the serial driver in CVS supports only a fixed (hardcoded) baudrate > - the architecture include file from cvs only has register definitions > while my port also has bitmasks for most registers as well as a > convenience function imx_gpio_mode which lets you set the gpio > primary/alternate functions without having to play with hex values. > - different boards supported. Two custom boards <-> MX1ADS. Adding > support for MX1ADS should be no problem, though, since we only have > to rewrite some register definitions. Unfortunately I don't > have the hardware. We will have one in the next few days. I'd love to help testing it. Steven