From: Steven Scholz <steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Re: nomen est omen: i.MX or mc9329 ?
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:11:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40DFC48A.90203@imc-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040627181831.GI21651@pengutronix.de>
Robert Schwebel wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 01:25:40PM +0200, Steven Scholz wrote:
>
>>how will we call the Motorola i.MX processors in future?
>>
>>Will it be "imx", "i.MX", "iMX" or MC9328MX{1,21,L}?
>
> The original 2.4 Linux port was mx1ads which is definitely wrong: it is
> the name of the Motorola development board. Following the scheme of the
> other architectures and platforms I would vote for imx.
Following the scheme of the other architectures and platforms _and_ speaking
as a hardware developer I would vote for MC9328MX...
Or at least "iMX".
>>Should we call the eval board "mx1ads" oder "M93281ADS" as Motorola does
>>and as it is printed on it?
>
>
> mx1ads would be fine for me.
(see above) M93281ADS.
Anyone else? ;-)
Steven
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-28 7:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-27 11:25 [U-Boot-Users] nomen est omen: i.MX or mc9329 ? Steven Scholz
2004-06-27 18:18 ` [U-Boot-Users] " Robert Schwebel
2004-06-28 7:11 ` Steven Scholz [this message]
2004-06-28 7:19 ` llandre
2004-06-28 9:20 ` Robert Schwebel
2004-06-28 9:31 ` Steven Scholz
2004-06-28 9:35 ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-06-28 10:51 ` Robert Schwebel
2004-06-28 11:37 ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-06-28 12:38 ` Robert Schwebel
2004-06-28 14:10 ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-06-28 14:17 ` Steven Scholz
2004-06-28 12:14 ` Steven Scholz
2004-06-28 13:01 ` Robert Schwebel
2004-06-28 15:15 ` Sascha Hauer
2004-06-28 9:57 ` llandre
2004-06-28 10:09 ` Steven Scholz
2004-06-28 11:07 ` llandre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40DFC48A.90203@imc-berlin.de \
--to=steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox