From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steven Scholz <steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:11:06 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Re: nomen est omen: i.MX or mc9329 ?
In-Reply-To: <20040627181831.GI21651@pengutronix.de>
References: <40DEAEB4.9090504@imc-berlin.de> <20040627181831.GI21651@pengutronix.de>
Message-ID: <40DFC48A.90203@imc-berlin.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Robert Schwebel wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 01:25:40PM +0200, Steven Scholz wrote:
> 
>>how will we call the Motorola i.MX processors in future?
>>
>>Will it be "imx", "i.MX", "iMX" or MC9328MX{1,21,L}?
> 
> The original 2.4 Linux port was mx1ads which is definitely wrong: it is
> the name of the Motorola development board. Following the scheme of the
> other architectures and platforms I would vote for imx. 

Following the scheme of the other architectures and platforms _and_ speaking 
as a hardware developer I would vote for MC9328MX...
Or at least "iMX".

>>Should we call the eval board "mx1ads" oder "M93281ADS" as Motorola does 
>>and as it is printed on it?
> 
> 
> mx1ads would be fine for me. 

(see above) M93281ADS.

Anyone else? ;-)

Steven