From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steven Scholz <steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:09:41 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Re: nomen est omen: i.MX or mc9329 ?
In-Reply-To: <6.0.1.1.0.20040628115415.01f96428@192.168.2.1>
References: <40DEAEB4.9090504@imc-berlin.de> <20040627181831.GI21651@pengutronix.de> <40DFC48A.90203@imc-berlin.de> <6.0.1.1.0.20040628091607.01f96570@192.168.2.1> <20040628092036.GB13868@pengutronix.de> <6.0.1.1.0.20040628115415.01f96428@192.168.2.1>
Message-ID: <40DFEE65.7060908@imc-berlin.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

llandre wrote:

> 
>> Stop - we have to differentiate between the "machine type" (which is
>> imx) and the _implementation_ (which could be something like M9328MXL)
>> and the "board" (M83281ADS).
>>
>> What about this:
>>
>>         "machine type" (arch/arm/mach-xxx in Linux nomenclature): imx
>>         "implementation" (asm/arm/arch-xxx/yyy.h): MC9328MXL
>>         "board": M83281ADS
> 
> 
> For me everything is ok but the board name. I never saw that name before.
> On my board I can read:
> 
> MOTOROLA
> M9328MX1ADS/M9328MXLADS
> Ver 2.0
> 
> Do you really have that name on your PCB?

Arhg!

I just noticed: While the chip is called MC9328MX1 the eval board has 
actually M9328MX1ADS printed on it (which is the order code). Note the 
missing 'C' ...

Steven