From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Scholz Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:53:56 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Cleanup cpu/arm920t In-Reply-To: <6.0.1.1.0.20040811125640.040a1390@192.168.2.1> References: <20040810082502.8AD07C109F@atlas.denx.de> <411890AF.4090308@imc-berlin.de> <4119F8D4.5090400@imc-berlin.de> <6.0.1.1.0.20040811125640.040a1390@192.168.2.1> Message-ID: <411A4114.9030109@imc-berlin.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de llandre wrote: > The build has been completed successfully. > According to you is this solution ok? Wolfang? But this means "ar crv libarm920t.a" is called several times. We have to be careful then since the option "crv" would overwrite existing members of the archive. Right? I think that's why llandre used ep93xx_interrupts.o instead of interrupts.o. So maybe the SoC name in the files is not redundand... On the other hand this could be used to explicitly _overwrite_ the generic stuff in (let's say) cpu/arm920t/interrupt.o by (let's say) cpu/arm920t/imx/interrupt.o. But I am afraid code is duplicated by people again... -- Steven