From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steven Scholz <steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 18:06:47 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Cleanup cpu/arm920t
In-Reply-To: <411A4114.9030109@imc-berlin.de>
References: <20040810082502.8AD07C109F@atlas.denx.de> <411890AF.4090308@imc-berlin.de> <4119F8D4.5090400@imc-berlin.de> <6.0.1.1.0.20040811125640.040a1390@192.168.2.1> <411A4114.9030109@imc-berlin.de>
Message-ID: <411A4417.7000505@imc-berlin.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Steven Scholz wrote:

> llandre wrote:
> 
>> The build has been completed successfully.
>> According to you is this solution ok? Wolfang?
> 
> 
> But this means "ar crv libarm920t.a" is called several times.
> 
> We have to be careful then since the option "crv" would overwrite 
> existing members of the archive. Right?
> I think that's why llandre used ep93xx_interrupts.o instead of 
> interrupts.o.
> So maybe the SoC name in the files is not redundand...
> 
> On the other hand this could be used to explicitly _overwrite_ the 
> generic stuff in (let's say) cpu/arm920t/interrupt.o by (let's say) 
> cpu/arm920t/imx/interrupt.o. But I am afraid code is duplicated by 
> people again...

Or maybe use "ar cqv lib$(CPU).a" in the subdirs... ?

--
Steven