[U-Boot-Users] RTL8139 compilation error

[U-Boot-Users] RTL8139 compilation error

[Santoso, Yusdi]

Hi all,

I am currently trying to run u-boot on 8241 based board. I am copying my settings from MUSENKI which is also based on 8241.

The board has on board Realtek8139 based ethernet port, so I enable CONFIG_RTL8139. But during compilation, the following error occur:
rtl8139.c: In function 'rtl8139_probe':
rtl8139.c:253: '_IO_BASE' undeclared (first us in the function) 
...

Basically the out* definitions refused to compile because it is tranlated into _out*( (addr)+_IO_BASE, ... ).
So how do you get this _IO_BASE? Should I define it in the "include/config/<board>.h" ?

The only other board using RTL8139 is TB0229 but I also can't find _IO_BASE definition anywhere.

Thanks, any help is appreciated.



Yusdi

[U-Boot-Users] RTL8139 compilation error

[Masami Komiya]

This is a PPC's issue, I think.

Does anyone know about this ?

Masami Komiya


Santoso, Yusdi wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> I am currently trying to run u-boot on 8241 based board. I am copying my settings from MUSENKI which is also based on 8241.
> 
> The board has on board Realtek8139 based ethernet port, so I enable CONFIG_RTL8139. But during compilation, the following error occur:
> rtl8139.c: In function 'rtl8139_probe':
> rtl8139.c:253: '_IO_BASE' undeclared (first us in the function) 
> ...
> 
> Basically the out* definitions refused to compile because it is tranlated into _out*( (addr)+_IO_BASE, ... ).
> So how do you get this _IO_BASE? Should I define it in the "include/config/<board>.h" ?
> 
> The only other board using RTL8139 is TB0229 but I also can't find _IO_BASE definition anywhere.
> 
> Thanks, any help is appreciated.
> 
> 
> 
> Yusdi
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
> Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
> Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot-Users mailing list
> U-Boot-Users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
> 
> 

[U-Boot-Users] RTL8139 compilation error

[Wolfgang Denk]

In message <16808BEAD68708489AE865F48D8793890301D4@AMSE2K02.adaptec.com> you wrote:
> 
> So how do you get this _IO_BASE? Should I define it in the
> "include/config/<board>.h" ?

Yes.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87  Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88  Email: wd at denx.de
One of the advantages of being a captain is being able to ask for ad-
vice without necessarily having to take it.
	-- Kirk, "Dagger of the Mind", stardate 2715.2

[U-Boot-Users] RTL8139 compilation error

[Santoso, Yusdi]

What value should I put in then?
Is this the PCI_IO_BASE? Or 0x0000 ?
Hm...I'm not so familiar with PPC, does it have separate IO and Mem instruction like in x86 or the same address as in MC68000?

Thanks,

Yusdi

-----Original Message-----
From: wd@denx.de [mailto:wd at denx.de]
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 2:20 AM
To: Santoso, Yusdi
Cc: u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] RTL8139 compilation error 


In message <16808BEAD68708489AE865F48D8793890301D4@AMSE2K02.adaptec.com> you wrote:
> 
> So how do you get this _IO_BASE? Should I define it in the
> "include/config/<board>.h" ?

Yes.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87  Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88  Email: wd at denx.de
One of the advantages of being a captain is being able to ask for ad-
vice without necessarily having to take it.
	-- Kirk, "Dagger of the Mind", stardate 2715.2

[U-Boot-Users] RTL8139 compilation error

[Wolfgang Denk]

In message <16808BEAD68708489AE865F48D879389030451@AMSE2K02.adaptec.com> you wrote:
> What value should I put in then?
> Is this the PCI_IO_BASE? Or 0x0000 ?

I don;t know your hardware. It's definitely NOT 0x0000.

> Hm...I'm not so familiar with PPC, does it have separate IO and Mem
> instruction like in x86 or the same address as in MC68000?

Find someone who has a clue. You will not  get  far  without  even  a
basic  understanding  of  uyour  hardwarwe.  [Actually,  an  in-depth
knowledge of the hardware is required.]

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87  Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88  Email: wd at denx.de
As in certain cults it is possible to kill a process if you know  its
true name.                      -- Ken Thompson and Dennis M. Ritchie