From: Steven Scholz <steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] CONFIG_BOOTBINFUNC for AT91RM9200
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 13:54:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41A48489.80203@imc-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041123172308.9BAE7C1430@atlas.denx.de>
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <41A36CFE.9050900@imc-berlin.de> you wrote:
>
>>Hmm. So I suggest replacing it with CONFIG_INIT_LOWLEVEL or CONFIG_LOWLEVEL_INIT.
>
>
> Hmmm.. CONFIG or CFG? And what exactly is low (vs. high?) level here?
>
>
>>But then: these init steps (clocks and memory) are vital for U-Boot to run. So
>>why do we need this define anyway if these steps should be done always... ?
>
>
> Good question. The only reason I can think of is to allob such a
> two-stage boot loader as used by Atmel on the AT91RM9200DK.
So we check if all other arm920t boards have an implementation of memsetup().
Then kick out CONFIG_INIT_CRITICAL and introduce
CONFIG_DO_NOT_MAKE_LOWLEVEL_INIT or something like that !? ;-)
--
Steven Scholz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-24 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-23 14:11 [U-Boot-Users] CONFIG_BOOTBINFUNC for AT91RM9200 Steven Scholz
2004-11-23 15:42 ` Steven Scholz
2004-11-23 16:42 ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-11-23 16:51 ` Steven Scholz
2004-11-23 17:18 ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-11-23 15:45 ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-11-23 15:51 ` Steven Scholz
2004-11-23 16:52 ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-11-23 17:01 ` Steven Scholz
2004-11-23 17:23 ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-11-24 12:54 ` Steven Scholz [this message]
2004-11-24 15:06 ` Wolfgang Denk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-11-24 7:46 Friedrich, Lars
2004-11-24 10:26 ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-11-24 10:54 Paugam Luc
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41A48489.80203@imc-berlin.de \
--to=steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox