From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tolunay Orkun <listmember@orkun.us>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:09:59 -0600
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] PPC970FX 64-bit processor
In-Reply-To: <20050110173926.GD17790@tuxdriver.com>
References: <20050110151530.GA17790@tuxdriver.com> <200501101551.j0AFpOAq025585@il.marvell.com> <20050110173926.GD17790@tuxdriver.com>
Message-ID: <41E30B47.10908@orkun.us>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

It would break compatibility with existing scripts and documentation of 
everyone else. I think we should maintain earlier definitions at least 
for existing 32-bit implementations.

Best regards,
Tolunay

John W. Linville wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 05:53:11PM +0200, tzachi perelstein wrote:
> 
> 
>>I can be even more explicitly and suggest [.8, .16, .32, .64].
>>What do you think?  
> 
> 
> I think I like that even better.
> 
> John
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
> Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
> It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot-Users mailing list
> U-Boot-Users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users