From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Peter Asemann <peter.asemann@web.de>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 18:21:45 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] .../board/fads/flash.c confuses me - give me a
 hint
In-Reply-To: <20050112165449.981DDC108D@atlas.denx.de>
References: <20050112165449.981DDC108D@atlas.denx.de>
Message-ID: <41E55CA9.6080108@web.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

> There must ne some strange fascination about the FADS port. I  really
> wonder  why  everybody  is  picking  one  of the most complicated and
> poroblematic ports...

I have an idea / a strong suggestion:
Maybe it's that this port seems to "fit" so many different CPUs and 
configurations that every Newbie thinks that he/she could easily copy 
the "right" parts of the code from there; while trying to do so, Mr. or 
Mrs. Newbie get lost in the super-enhanced or just wildly grown and 
tricky FADS code.

> Pleas ehave a loot at least at some other drivers, too.

I had and will have.

> Forget what the FADS is doing. Think about what is  needed  for  your
> own hardware, and implement this.

I'll do as I lack other options. I think it's recommended to develop the 
port for "my" hardware based upon 1.1.2? I started when 1.1.1 was the 
latest version.

Thanks a lot and best regards,

Peter Asemann