From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jerry Van Baren Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:49:36 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Revision COntrol, Patch Database In-Reply-To: <20050118211358.6006EC108D@atlas.denx.de> References: <20050118211358.6006EC108D@atlas.denx.de> Message-ID: <41ED9280.6020806@smiths-aerospace.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <41ED32F0.3020109@smiths-aerospace.com> you wrote: > >>The obvious answer (but not necessarily the correct answer :-) is gforge >> http://gforge.org/ >>It says it can use subversion for version control as well as cvs. That >>doesn't get you your distributed repository, however it does make it an >>easier switch. > > > Subversion is nice, but distributed repositories are essential to me. > > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk Another possibility is Aegis by Peter Miller http://gd.tuwien.ac.at/softeng/Aegis/README.html http://aegis.sourceforge.net/ I have not used it, but have looked it over several times. It looks intriguing. It also looks rather more heavyweight than arch. I was looking at arch a bit, thinking it should be usable with gforge. A quick google search showed others thought the same thing, including a big thread pointed to in the article "Arch and XMLRPC and BugZilla, posted 8 Aug 2003" (getting pretty old): http://www.advogato.org/article/694.html but the links to the discussions are dead. It also isn't clear what the discussion was (since it is MIA), whether it was gforge or gsoap or bugzilla or ??? gvb