From: Pantelis Antoniou <panto@intracom.gr>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] struct NS16550 {...} __attribute__ ((packed)) at ns16550.h
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 18:18:36 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <426D0A4C.5000105@intracom.gr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050425145653.E9CCDC1510@atlas.denx.de>
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <001501c5499f$f5364750$1780a8c0@art> you wrote:
>
>>>If this is really true, then there is either bug in GCC or in the code.
>>>If I code a 32 bit access the compiler must not use any other accesses.
>>
>>If you use __attribute__ ((packed)), you are telling the compiler you have
>>an unaligned data structure (e.g. longs not by-4 aligned). Therefore, GCC
>>will always reassemble the 32-bit value from byte accesses.
>
>
> You are wrong, with both of your statements.
>
> -> cat foo.c
> struct foo {
> unsigned long foo1;
> unsigned long foo2;
> unsigned long foo3;
> } __attribute__ ((packed));
>
> unsigned long dummy (struct foo *p)
> {
> return (p->foo1 + p->foo2 + p->foo3);
> }
>
>
> Test 1: PowerPC:
>
> -> ppc_8xx-gcc -O -S foo.c
> -> cat foo.s
> ...
> dummy:
> mr 9,3
> lwz 3,0(3)
> lwz 0,4(9)
> add 3,3,0
> lwz 0,8(9)
> add 3,3,0
> blr
>
>
> Test 2: MIPS:
>
> -> mips_4KC-gcc -O -S foo.c
> -> cat foo.s
> ...
> dummy:
> .frame $sp,0,$31 # vars= 0, regs= 0/0, args= 0, extra= 0
> .mask 0x00000000,0
> .fmask 0x00000000,0
> .set noreorder
> .cpload $25
> .set reorder
> ulw $2,0($4)
> ulw $3,4($4)
> #nop
> addu $2,$2,$3
> ulw $3,8($4)
> .set noreorder
> .set nomacro
> j $31
> addu $2,$2,$3
> .set macro
> .set reorder
>
>
> As you can see, GCC alway uses plain word accesses (32 bit).
>
>
>
Not on ARM it does not.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
>
Both PPC & MIPS can do proper unalligned load/stores (or fault to
an exception).
ARM (silently) does the wrong thing i.e. masks out the lower 2 bits.
So gcc on ARM generates byte load/stores.
Regards
Pantelis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-25 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-22 14:57 [U-Boot-Users] struct NS16550 {...} __attribute__ ((packed)) at ns16550.h Woojung.Huh at smsc.com
2005-04-22 18:39 ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-04-25 7:44 ` Jean-Paul Saman
2005-04-25 8:20 ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-04-25 14:06 ` Arthur Shipkowski
2005-04-25 14:56 ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-04-25 15:18 ` Pantelis Antoniou [this message]
2005-04-25 19:43 ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-04-25 20:15 ` Arthur Shipkowski
2005-04-25 20:59 ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-04-26 6:23 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2005-04-26 7:21 ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-04-26 14:32 ` Cory Tusar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-04-22 18:55 Woojung.Huh at smsc.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=426D0A4C.5000105@intracom.gr \
--to=panto@intracom.gr \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox