public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Scholz <steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] asynchronous clocking mode for arm920t
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 13:32:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4278B2D3.3070705@imc-berlin.de> (raw)

Hi all,

( was: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 4/4] add csb637 (at91rm9200) support )

I wrote:

 >> this patch switches the at91rm9200 to synchronous clock mode after
 >> initialization (it would otherwise stay in FastBus mode which is
 >> the _slowest_ clock mode).
 >
 > But I thought FastBus mode is the prefered setting for ARM cpus.

Now I retract the above statement and claim the oposite! ;-)

Anders' is correct. Atmel support told me a year ago
"Linux uses the Asynchronous mode."
With his patch I now get 79.87 BogoMIPS again (without less the 40).

So I helps for AT91RM9200.

But I don't see something similar for my i.MX ARM9 and still this on in 
running as fast as expected...
The reason ist that this setting is done in board/mx1fs2/lowlevel_init.S and 
board/scb9328/lowlevel_init.S.

So I'd say the asynchronous clocking mode is best for all arm920t cpus and 
thus maybe this is the better patch:

Index: u-boot/cpu/arm920t/start.S
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/u-boot/u-boot/cpu/arm920t/start.S,v
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -r1.13 start.S
--- u-boot/cpu/arm920t/start.S  5 Apr 2005 22:30:51 -0000       1.13
+++ u-boot/cpu/arm920t/start.S  4 May 2005 11:27:35 -0000
@@ -246,13 +246,14 @@
         mcr     p15, 0, r0, c8, c7, 0   /* flush v4 TLB */

         /*
-        * disable MMU stuff and caches
+        * disable MMU stuff and caches, switch to Asynchronous Clocking Mode
          */
         mrc     p15, 0, r0, c1, c0, 0
         bic     r0, r0, #0x00002300     @ clear bits 13, 9:8 (--V- --RS)
         bic     r0, r0, #0x00000087     @ clear bits 7, 2:0 (B--- -CAM)
         orr     r0, r0, #0x00000002     @ set bit 2 (A) Align
         orr     r0, r0, #0x00001000     @ set bit 12 (I) I-Cache
+       orr     r0, r0, #0xC0000000     @ set bit 31 (iA) and 30 (nF)
         mcr     p15, 0, r0, c1, c0, 0

Can someone comment on the s3c24x0 cpu?

--
Steven

             reply	other threads:[~2005-05-04 11:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-04 11:32 Steven Scholz [this message]
2005-05-04 11:45 ` [U-Boot-Users] asynchronous clocking mode for arm920t Anders Larsen
2005-05-04 11:51   ` Steven Scholz
2005-05-09  8:15     ` Anders Larsen
2005-05-09 10:18       ` Steven Scholz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4278B2D3.3070705@imc-berlin.de \
    --to=steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox