public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [U-Boot-Users] Erase in UBoot
@ 2005-06-30 13:25 Bharathi Subramanian
  2005-06-30 13:46 ` Wolfgang Denk
  2005-06-30 20:54 ` Tolunay Orkun
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bharathi Subramanian @ 2005-06-30 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Hello All,

We are using UBoot 1.0.0, During continuous 2nd erase operation, the
no .of DOT is increased. I like to know whether this is something do
with UBoot or flash chip or is it normal behavior ??

ROM # erase B0100000 B07FFFFF
.............................................. done
Erased 111 sectors
ROM # erase B0100000 B07FFFFF
..................................................... done
Erased 111 sectors
ROM #

Thanks,
-- 
Bharathi S

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot-Users] Erase in UBoot
  2005-06-30 13:25 [U-Boot-Users] Erase in UBoot Bharathi Subramanian
@ 2005-06-30 13:46 ` Wolfgang Denk
  2005-06-30 20:54 ` Tolunay Orkun
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2005-06-30 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Hello,

in message <Pine.LNX.4.44.0506301844420.31031-100000@bharathi.midascomm.com> you wrote:
> 
> We are using UBoot 1.0.0, During continuous 2nd erase operation, the
> no .of DOT is increased. I like to know whether this is something do
> with UBoot or flash chip or is it normal behavior ??

This is normal behaviour. The dots are printed  one  per  second,  so
they give an apprximation how long the erase takes. It is normal that
it  will  take longer and longer the older your flash gets (i. e. the
more rease cycles it has gone through)

> ROM # erase B0100000 B07FFFFF
> .............................................. done
> Erased 111 sectors
> ROM # erase B0100000 B07FFFFF
> ..................................................... done
> Erased 111 sectors
> ROM #

In this case the increase was approx.  15%  which  is  poretty  long;
either  your  flash  is  brand new (burn in phase) or it's pretty old
(near end of life)?

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
On a clear disk you can seek forever.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot-Users] Erase in UBoot
  2005-06-30 13:25 [U-Boot-Users] Erase in UBoot Bharathi Subramanian
  2005-06-30 13:46 ` Wolfgang Denk
@ 2005-06-30 20:54 ` Tolunay Orkun
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tolunay Orkun @ 2005-06-30 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Bharathi Subramanian wrote:
> Hello All,
> 
> We are using UBoot 1.0.0, During continuous 2nd erase operation, the
> no .of DOT is increased. I like to know whether this is something do
> with UBoot or flash chip or is it normal behavior ??
> 
> ROM # erase B0100000 B07FFFFF
> .............................................. done
> Erased 111 sectors
> ROM # erase B0100000 B07FFFFF
> ..................................................... done
> Erased 111 sectors
> ROM #
> 
> Thanks,

Why don't you check the code. Looks like flash driver is putting dots 
based on time and the second erase is taking more time. Also, 1.0.0 is 
very old code now.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-06-30 20:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-06-30 13:25 [U-Boot-Users] Erase in UBoot Bharathi Subramanian
2005-06-30 13:46 ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-06-30 20:54 ` Tolunay Orkun

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox